dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
34

WhyADuck
Premium Member
join:2003-03-05

1 edit

7 recommendations

WhyADuck to waffull

Premium Member

to waffull

Re: I dont get it now

said by waffull:

A home phone SHOULD BE a requirement... preferably a true landline. During natural and man made disasters, a good old fashioned copper/CCA line is going to almost always work. VOIP will not work unless you have power backup. Cell phones are, at best, 50/50.

That's a pretty sweeping overgeneralization. And it's easy to pontificate that something should be a requirement when you're not the one that has to pay for it. God save us from the "safety nuts", they've already made it so kids can't play like we did when we were kids.
said by waffull:

Consider it a really cheap insurance policy. Even if you no longer pay for service, the phone company is required to keep your line alive for 911 calls. No oversubscribing of cell towers, no network preemption for emergency services (See ATT's supposed "parallel" network.) Do yourself, your family and your friends a favor... For a pittance, keep your landline.

First of all, it's not that cheap in many parts of the country, especially after you add all the hidden fees and taxes. Second, some phone companies are better about maintaining their lines than others, do you know that yours will be Johnny-on-the-spot to make any needed repairs? And natural disasters destroy phone lines, too. Buried lines are frequently cut by other utilities and others doing excavating, and overhead lines are just as susceptible as electric lines to damage.

Also, the idea of you having a solid copper pair direct to the central office is pretty much a myth for people like you in a rural area; there's a very high probability that your line is converted to fiber at one of those big green boxes and that converter requires electricity to work. Yeah, it probably has a battery backup that will keep you going for at least part of a day, assuming the battery has been maintained and correctly hooked up (that's not always a given), but sooner or later those converters will be dead as a doornail if they don't get power.

After hurricane Katrina there were places where the regular phone lines had stopped working but VoIP continued to work. So sure, go ahead any buy your "cheap insurance" if you really believe it makes you safer, but honestly it would be a lot cheaper to get a battery powered ham or CB radio so that on the (hopefully rare) occasion where you have no other way to communicate you can still talk to someone in the "outside world" without paying a ridiculous monthly rate (AND maybe "long distance" rates to anyplace outside your limited "local calling area"). Or you could do what people have done for eons and realize there is always risk in life, and it's the risk you haven't planned for that will probably get you in the end.

cb14
join:2013-02-04
Miami Beach, FL

3 recommendations

cb14

Member

One problem with 911 calling in medical emergencies is that people often cannot get to their phones, cannot dial or cannot speak. At least for singles with medical issues, a push button device carried on the body alerting directly medical response makes far more sense.
Pots used to be the most reliable utility, not any more. The way to keep up connectivity is to have multiple solutions, VoIP, cell phone, possibly a cheap second prepaid cell from a different provider and for those with deep pockets a satelite phone.
During my life ( baby boomer) I never had to use 911 from home.
Risk management is a forgotten virtue in post fact era. Gazillions are being spent to fight nonexistent, futile or improbable dangers while true dangers are around virtually unchallenged.
PX Eliezer0
join:2017-01-15
Ho Ho Kus, NJ

4 recommendations

PX Eliezer0

Member

said by cb14:

Risk management is a forgotten virtue in post fact era. Gazillions are being spent to fight nonexistent, futile or improbable dangers while true dangers are around virtually unchallenged.

Exactly.

Several generic blood pressure medicines were recalled in recent months (with each successive one there is decreasing publicity) supposedly because of a [really minuscule] cancer risk from a contaminant.

But the people who got scared and stopped taking their blood pressure meds because of this, or who simply stopped for a while while trying to get replacements, are in far more danger from blood pressure problems and stroke than from the tiny long-term cancer risk.

No sense of proportionality.

And as the news media (of all flavors) gets more superficial and sensational, there is no effort to discuss such nuances.