dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
275
share rss forum feed

plato6

join:2001-12-28

high pings

I am using terayon (sharkfin) and when pinging gateway I get 230ms. average. I use ping -t 65.48.118.1 -l 1472.I ping using a large packet.I have sohoware nic can others please ping their gateways and post their times.I have tried lancity modem but packet loss and slow downloads I am at keele&401 in TO.What is a normal time when pinging gateway using a large packet?please post some times as rogers has opened a ticket.I think the terayon gateways are overloaded.



Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada

Ping statistics for 65.48.118.1:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 210ms, Maximum = 241ms, Average = 222ms

Could you run this test. I want to see how much packet loss your line is getting

»/linequality

Steve
--
18.98Ghz of Cancer killing power commin at yah.


plato6

join:2001-12-28

reply to plato6

»/quality/nil/768642

[Mod note: We just need the link so you dont give out your IP]
[text was edited by moderator]



Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada
reply to plato6

Sorry I messed up. Those pings are fine for that packet size. Its about the same as mine and I get speeds around 2.5Mb/s. Dont know what to tell yah

What does your tweak test look like?
»/tweaks

Steve
--
18.98Ghz of Cancer killing power commin at yah.


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

»ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/···weaktest



Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada
reply to plato6

Ok well to start you can download DrTcp and set your rwin to 29200 and windows scaling off and see what that does.

Steve
--
18.98Ghz of Cancer killing power commin at yah.


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

I have tried a lot of different rwins nothing helps in ping times.I have been using dr.tcp for 1 year still large packet pings should be under 200ms.This is the gateway website latency is worse.



Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada

reply to plato6

If you lower the rwin it can help lower packet loss. There is no reason to run such a large buffer when you aren't getting speeds over 1mb/s even. Even if you got 5mb/s+ you wouldn't need such a high rwin

If you ping your phub with normal size packets what ping times do you get?

Steve

[text was edited by author 2002-05-26 21:22:44]


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

With 32 byte packets I average between 21- 35 ms.Of course to gateway.



OLDb34tBoX
Premium
join:2001-03-07
reply to plato6

I can recommend some Dr. TCP settings. Plato, I think it is a hardware issue you have, but you could try This
I noticed your tweak settings to be slightly extreme, what operating system are you using?
--
"That Tommy Hilfiger pose, can't block my verbal flows." - Tachichi


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

I am using winxppro,sohoware nic,terayon(sharkfin)modem and have tried different settings in dr.tcp but nothing drops the high pings.



elusion
Premium
join:2001-10-25
Scarborough, ON
reply to plato6

Tweaking your settings, may and may not affect your latency. I know this guy, who tweaked and tweaked, and yet he still gets 305 ms to his GATEWAY! I have been getting some high pings lately, I guess you might just have to wait and see what comes back with that ticket.
--
-In the game of broadband, sometimes you win some, sometimes you loose some-


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

what do others get when pinging gateway using
ping -t 65.48.xxx.x -l 1472. 65.48.xxx.x is gateway or phub please post results. thanks



Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada
reply to plato6

I get the same pings as you

What are your speed tests like?
»nyc.speakeasy.net/
»bos.speakeasy.net/

Steve
--
18.98Ghz of Cancer killing power commin at yah.



dataiv

join:2002-02-25
Ottawa, ON
reply to plato6

Here are my ping times to my gateway using a 1472 byte packet size. (with Cogeco).. much lower than your >200 ms pings.

radium# ping -s 1472 24.141.144.1
PING 24.141.144.1 (24.141.144.1): 1472 data bytes
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=21.782 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=20.057 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=19.411 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=34.903 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=32.531 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=43.329 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=45.557 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=16.233 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=33.359 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=15.962 ms
1480 bytes from 24.141.144.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=15.552 ms
^C
--- 24.141.144.1 ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 15.552/27.152/45.557/10.643 ms


plato6

join:2001-12-28
reply to plato6

can I get some other ping tests please pings to gateway
should not be over 200ms.
»/speedtests/14···22559060


vernon9

join:2001-12-02
Quincy, MA

reply to plato6

Does anyone get these type of predictable ping spikes? I'm in Mississauga, and there seems to be a big problem a the Teleglobe-Sprint connection, as evidenced here:

»/quality/nil/763534
[text was edited by author 2002-05-28 12:19:14]