site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Cal-Iso ·Weather ·Official LA web site
AuthorAll Replies


MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
kudos:3

reply to MacLeech

Re: Emhinkes

Check out these links for more info on the moratoriums:

Link #1: City council on Utility permits

The line reading was interesting:
quote:
City Council approved a motion instructing the City Engineer not to grant utility / excavation permits or revocable permits and the Department of Water and Power not to approve pole-mounts for telecommunication cabinets and conduits unless exempted through Council offices or, in an emergency, by the Department of Public Works.
Link #2: internet related equipment placement

Link #3: Latest updates from the telecom task force

I especially like the end of that last link:

quote:
5-28-02 - Information Technology and General Services Committee report ADOPTED to:
1. ADOPT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) report recommendations dated May 23, 2002, relative to the AGFSP, attached to the Council file.
2. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to immediately lift the moratorium on utility and excavation permits enacted under Council file 99-0300 and fully implement the provisions of the AGFSP.
3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance within 90 days to codify the provisions of the AGFSP into the Los Angeles Municipal Code.
4. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to coordinate with the Information Technology Agency to post this AGFSP on the City’s homepage.
5. DIRECT City Departments, including the Department of Transportation and the Department of Water and Power, to review their existing policies for other facilities in the public right-of-way and recommend any appropriate changes necessary to comply with the intent of the new AGFSP.
5-30-02 - File to Information Technology and General Services Committee Clerk OK

The moratorium enacted in February of 1999 by the City of Los Angeles was finally lifted at the end of May 2002!!! In fact the city council repeatedly extended the moratorium, in 120 day to 6 month intervals, over the last 3 years. Think of the backlog...

So if you are wondering why boadband rollout has been so slow in the city of Los Angeles, go talk to the city council members and ask them.

--
Tests: Speed, Trace, Tweaks, Port Scan Cable: FAQ.


[text was edited by author 2002-06-05 16:58:03]


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

With respect to Adelphia, they should have been working with the City during the moratorium period, performing work that did not require an excavation permit or power from DWP. These two points happen to be where Adelphia is log jammed now, right?

But consider the FACT that Adelphia did not commence one iota of construction in LA until the fall of 2000. This work included the stringing of fiber throughout the City. Moreover, consider Mr. Winthrop's words where he now stated publicly that the Sherman Oaks, Eagle Rock and East LA systems are cumulatively less than 50% complete in a release. Consider that Perron's statement in March mentioned the Sherman Oaks system as 40% complete and the Eagle Rock system as 5% complete. My questions to you MacLeech would be (1) what effort did Adelphia engage in to have the moratorium lifted, and (2) what could they have accomplished in the City while they were prevented from installing above ground cabinets, and having DWP provision power to those sites?

On point (1) its important to note that any moratorium of duration greater than one year is presumptively held INVALID should the moratorium be challenged in court.

The City certainly is at fault here for the moratorium being established. But honestly, Adelphia was asleep at the wheel or too busy playing golf or counting cash, as the moratorium could have been challenged in court as early as mid-2000, but no one did anything about it. Lemme guess.... I could have done something, with all of my clout and cash!

But when ALL is said and done, and you step back objectively, you realize that (1) Adelphia agreed to purchase Century, I believe in Sept 98; (2) they closed on the transaction, I believe, in March '99; so (3) during that time they were conducting their own due diligence.

Bottom line, Adelphia should have known about the effort to impose a moratorium early in their review process, and if not, they certainly knew by the time they closed the transaction with Century.

The biggest problem I see here is one of PUBLIC RELATIONS. This is only one of the areas where Adelphia failed, but here it failed big time. Despite the moratorium, and their apparent knowledge of it (which I'm waiting for you to deny....), and its effect on their efforts in the City of LA, they cont'd to tell their customers "within 6 months" with respect to digital cable and/or cable modem. Am I not correct on this?

Remember the Bill Rosendahl letter of Sept '99 that included two coupons, one for cable modem, and another for "digital STB" installation. How can Adelphia reconcile its behavior with the facts it now points to? Hmmm.
--
A proud card carrying member of the Right Wing Conspiracy.

"I have spoken... There will be peace in the valley."

[text was edited by author 2002-06-06 02:55:48]



ksuki

join:1999-10-28
Pomona, CA

When I was late in delivering a product to one of my customers, what they told me seems to be applicable here ... "I don't care if you had to walk 20 miles, uphill in both directions under a 110 degree sun through 40 foot snowdrifts - you shouldn't have promised me you would deliver unless you knew you could. I'm interested in product, not hype or excuses.".

Or the one about the gorgeous gal who had been married for 10 years and her virtue was still intact - the reason, her husband was a salesman who kept telling her how good it was going to be.

Ken



IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

At what point should Adelphia be blamed for not sharing this information and for lying to us about what they obviously did know?

4 Days, 4 weeks, 4 months, 4 years? We've been through all those time intervals of promises....

So what's your tolerance level? You obviously seemed to have drawn judgment on mine.
--
A proud card carrying member of the Right Wing Conspiracy. "I have spoken... There will be peace in the valley."



MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
kudos:3

reply to IPPlanMan

Why didn't Adelphia explain the situation...

What sort of position was Adelphia in to make an issue of the City imposed moratoriums? Adelphia, as did all the incumbent cable providers, had the cards stacked against them.

1. The city controls cable franchise approval. link
2. All the cable franchises are up for renewal in 2002 (this has now been extended until 2003). link
3. The city council had approved the Winfirst cable franchise for overbuild in the city. (they declared bankruptcy in early 2002) link
4. The city had commissioned a report that didn't reflect well upon any of the incumbent cable companies due to the mergers and rebuild all of them been involved in over the last year. link
5. The city council controls if and when the telecommunications moratoriums would be lifted. link

In my opinion, Adelphia was cornered with the prospect of another company approved to start a new competitive operation, while at the same time being faced with the possibility of the city not renewing its franchise with Adelphia. The city had the upper hand in the situation and Adelphia wasn't about to publicly bite the hand of those who decide if they're going to be well fed for the next 10-20 years over what should have originially been a 1, maybe 2, year delay in plans. Only after Winfirst declared bankruptcy and the City Council disapproved its franchise agreement did Adelphia speak out against the city, even then it was restrained since the franchise renewal haven't been approved.
--
Trace, CableFAQ, NetTech, CiscoTAC


[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 11:46:16]


MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
kudos:3

Em, thanks for the links you found:

»www.larta.org/pl/NewsArticles/la···y00.html

»www.vica.com/old_site/positionpa···row.html

I believe your starting to realize that Adelphia, along with all of the other broadband providers, has had its hands tied in reguards to upgrading the city of Los Angeles.

Its too bad that, at this point, it seems like it might be too little, too late for Adelphia. Had these issues been brought to light earlier by enough concerned residents the City might have allowed the upgrades to proceed unimpeded months or years ago and you would most likely have cable modem service now.

But considering Adelphia's current situation, it will be delayed again for at least another few months. I don't think you will ever know how close you've been to getting cable modem service in your area now...
--
Trace, CableFAQ, NetTech, CiscoTAC

[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 12:07:29]



hobgoblin
Sortof Agoblin
Premium
join:2001-11-25
Orchard Park, NY
kudos:4

a very interesting discussion.
I thank everyone for it

Hob
being nice
--
These pretzels are making me thirsty



Jackson$
Need It Wrecked? 1-800-Marine

join:2001-11-17
Buffalo, NY

reply to IPPlanMan

edited.

...
[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 14:47:47]


Jackson$
Need It Wrecked? 1-800-Marine

join:2001-11-17
Buffalo, NY

reply to IPPlanMan

...

....
[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 14:48:15]


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

reply to MacLeech

Re: Why didn't Adelphia explain the situation...

Mac,

Your posts are very well informed and crafted. The only issue I take with you is that element of which I believe doesn't hold merit (i.e. that Adelphia knew from day one what the rules of the game were, yet did little about it and proceeded to lie to its subscribers; that Bill Rosendahl had the balls to continually have a policy of telling LA customers "it'll be here soon'" that Adelphia consciously put off LA for last, maybe for reasons of the moratorium.)

Clearly the City, in part is to blame for the past, but not for the present. Although I couldn't go to the last BITC meeting recently I was able to listen over the phone, and I heard Larry Winthrop getting raked over the coals last month for continuing to point to Century as the excuse for their delays in the upgrade.

Assuming Adelphia has the excuse of the moratorium, to give them the benefit of the doubt, your excuse that Adelphia couldn't point the finger at the City, does not ring true. You see, as you may know, on many issues, if the City can point the finger at the local franchising authority it will. This is exactly what Century did in the mid-90s when West LA had the 80 channel line up over a 550MHz system, and Santa Monica only had the 60 channel line up over a 450MHz. If you called Century, they were very quick to say "complain to the City." They wanted to have the public bring pressure on the City to perform. same could have been applied to LA in 2000.

Come on now Mac, I'm sure that Adelphia wanted to be a "good franchisee" and not rock the City's boat," but after the second moratorium extension, if I were in charge, I would say, enough is enough. I would have begun telling my customers, not officially of course, but those who complained, what the real deal was. Adelphia didn't as you know; and they continued to lie and mislead and create false hope for a service that was always on the horizon.

Given the fact that a moratorium beyond a year is presumptively invalid (as a matter of law), if Adelphia sued the City on this issue, it very likely would have prevailed. So that would take us from Feb '99 to Feb '00 at which Adelphia could have begun pressuring the City with this legal action. TWO DAMN YEARS have passed since then and nothing has gotten done.

Bottom line, the folks running Adelphia messed up big time.... It's too bad that the Coudersport savvyness didn't make it out West.

You say that I was close to getting broadband? I've got green boxes in my neighborhood on the poles. Hmm... How did those get there with a Moratorium? If you look on the southwest corner of 26th Street and San Vicente Blvd, you will see orange paint lines for what looks like an Adelphia equipment install on the sidewalk. There are two separate box outlines.... but sadly, no boxes.... sigh.

How close were we Mac? How long should it take to put stuff like this in assuming that Adelphia's construction halt didn't exist a this point? Ah... it's nice to dream....
--
A proud card carrying member of the Right Wing Conspiracy. "I have spoken... There will be peace in the valley."


MacLeech
The one and only
Premium
join:2001-07-14
SoCal
kudos:3

Em,
I don't know all of the politics involved, but clearly Adelphia wasn't the only company hurt by this lengthy moratorium. Verizon was clearly slowed in their DSL rollout, as was Sprint (search through the city coucil records) in placing some of its cell sites (which I believe were also used in their wireless ION broadband service).

I think, Adelphia was in the worst position of all the telecom companies due to the late entry into the market, antiquated cable systems, cable service report, heavy debt incured aquiring the franchises, and impending overbuilder. So I don't think the Adelphia management really wanted to take the position of "city whistleblower" and possibly blow the entire franchise deal vital to their success (obviously in question now) from being renegotiated favorably in 2002 (now 2003). That entire situation didn't exist in the mid-90s for Century in Santa Monica. Again its my opinion, concidering the reports I've seen, as far as the real reasons I don't know I wasn't invited to those meetings.

But if what you say is true reguarding moratoriums being "the fact that a moratorium beyond a year is presumptively invalid (as a matter of law)" why didn't any of the other telecom companies take the city to court? Again I think there is much more going on politically than has been revealed so far, otherwise the moratoriums would have been shot down in a heartbeat by every other telecom provider clamoring to provide service to the broadbandless residents of Los Angeles.

As far as the work Adelphia has accomplished, its been pretty extensive (albeit at a very slow pace) otherwise you wouldn't have the digital cable service you have(although now that I check, it isn't the full digital lineup, so your area is still bandwidth starved at some point).

Construction that needed permits wasn't completely halted, just extremely constrained and under very close scutiny by the city council.

quote from city council report:
9-14-99 - This days Council session - Motion - Miscikowski Mover 1999 / Hernandez - On February 23, 1999 the City Council approved a motion instructing the City Engineer not to grant utility/excavation permits or revocable permits and the Dept of Water and Power not to approve pole-mounts for telecommunication cabinets and conduits unless exempted through Council offices or in an emergency by the Dept of Public Works
The politics run deep...
--
Trace, CableFAQ, NetTech, CiscoTAC


[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 19:05:16]


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

"The politics run deep..."

Not now they don't.... This Cindy Miscikowski got a fire lit under her butt by that LA Times article.

»www.latimes.com/business/la-0000···16.story

(Copied because registration is required for LA Times)

March 16, 2002
Adelphia Says City Slowing Its Broadband Roll-Out
Internet: Company says reconstruction work for high-speed services is being delayed by lack of electricity from DWP.
 

   By JON HEALEY, TIMES STAFF WRITER
Despite a boost from federal regulators, the largest cable operator in Los Angeles said Friday that its roll-out of high-speed Internet services didn't have the power needed to get out of low gear--and blamed the city for the delay.

Of the five cable operators serving Greater Los Angeles, Adelphia Communications Corp. has offered high-speed cable modem service to the smallest percentage of its service area--a little less than 40%. By contrast, AT&T Corp., Cox Communications Inc., Charter Communications Inc. and Time Warner Cable say they have made cable modems available to at least 93% of their subscribers.

Cable modems have three main advantages over dial-up Internet access: They're up to 20 times faster, they're always connected to the Internet, and they don't tie up a phone line. The service, which typically costs $20 to $30 more a month than a dial-up account, is widely viewed as one of the critical precursors to the distribution of music and movies via the Internet. Aiming to promote high-speed Internet access, the Federal Communications Commission said Thursday that cable modems were an information service, not a cable service, greatly reducing the threat of local regulation.

But Lee Perron, Adelphia's vice president of corporate affairs in Southern California, said the main hurdle for his company had not been regulation; it had been getting the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to provide electricity.

Before it can offer service to former customers of Century Communications Corp., which Adelphia bought for $5.2 billion in 1999, Adelphia must replace Century's antiquated cables with high-capacity two-way systems that allow data to flow in and out of a home.
Perron said reconstruction work in the Sherman Oaks and Westwood areas was only about 40% finished. In the Eagle Rock area, only 5% of the system has been redone.

Perron and Larry Windsor, regional government affairs manager for Adelphia, said the construction was being delayed by the DWP, which had been slow to provide power, and the Department of Public Works, which had dragged its feet on trenching permits.
Adelphia has about 500 miles of network to install and is building only 25 to 30 miles a week because of the administrative delays, Perron said.

"We have literally approximately 500 power supplies [for the new system] already hung on the poles," Perron said. "Some of them have been there for a year and a half. We're just waiting for them to get turned on."
DWP officials had no immediate response to Adelphia's complaints.

Windsor said the explanation from the DWP and Public Works had been the same: Hiring freezes had backed up the flow of work. The firm has been asking city officials, including City Council members Jack Weiss and Cindy Miscikowski, to help Adelphia press city agencies to pick up the pace.

Lisa Hansen, a spokeswoman for Weiss, said his aides had passed along Adelphia's concerns to the DWP. Miscikowski's office had no immediate comment.

Perron said Adelphia planned to start offering cable modem services in neighborhoods where its cables had been upgraded, even though the rebuild was far from complete. The company plans to launch services in West Los Angeles and Sherman Oaks within 60 days, and in Eagle Rock within 90 days, he said.

Compare that article to this one:

»www6.ladwp.com/whatnew/dwpnews/042502.htm

Hmmmm..... And just a month later, the DWP was all smiles.... Sigh....

Interesting how this occurred under the guise of a Moratorium.... selective Moratorium that is.
[text was edited by author 2002-06-07 20:03:07]


Monday, 04-Jun 08:57:36 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics