Ritz8
join:2001-10-31
Young America, MN | I am not pleased... Yea i just got capped this morning...
But the is FREAKING BS!
Im getting 842/185 on my speed tests..There no way im paying for this..I want to be close to the 1.5/192 ...Im not paying 45.00/month to have this...Too bad i cant get AEI.. 
Anyways im calling them tomorow..I want higher speeds..I went from over 2mbps to this..Im cancelling.
BTW in game servers i was playing in b4...I got 100 pings..Now there 600-700..Theres no way im putting up with a ping so high..
Anyways  |
|
| Join the club, I went from 3000/384k (Easily 300K+ d/l) to this: »/speedtests/12···25670213
Oh yeah, it was also mint when I "tweaked" my modem for a day. =]
2002-06-15 17:13:06 Speed test (nyc.speakeasy.net) 5228/361 kbps
I'd bet some of you remember that.
Craziest thing is, I used to have 48ms in Quake3 before the infamous cap, and still have 48ms after the cap.
"The dying words of a Rogers customer"
[text was edited by author 2002-07-03 00:29:34] |
|
| reply to Ritz8
Don't worry about it boys...
I'm getting some terrible speeds....pings that are HIGH as F##K and I'm seeing some nice packet loss
You are not alone! |
|
 rAfChOwPremium
join:2001-03-19
Toronto, ON | reply to Ritz8
It's time to change ISP's! |
|
| You can say that again Raf. The wheels are in motion |
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17
 ·TekSavvy Cable
 ·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to Ritz8
Hehe, who would be pleased about their speeds being slashed in half and the price stayed the same. Rogers figures this is a perfectly good thing to do, since they never guaranteed any speeds in the past. I told one tech that I was getting 300KB/sec downloads, and he screamed at me saying those speeds were almost unheard of on the Rogers network. So go figure. He nearly shit his pants when I told him that back in the Shaw days I routinely went over 1000KB/sec sustained speeds on huge files... It was so funny, this guy was quite the moron.
--
Crunch for »www.team-discovery.com/ |
|
|
|
| said by HiVolt:
Hehe, who would be pleased about their speeds being slashed in half and the price stayed the same.
There has been a 50% decrease in the speed cap and a twelve and a half percent or $5.00 increase in monthly fees. |
|
 mau108MauPremium
join:2001-10-07
Thornhill, ON
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to Ritz8
hmm you guys should run tests from tucows server eh...
On nyc I get 1100-2000
but when I run my download test from tucows I get around 320-350 Kilobytes (2560-2800 kiloBITs) steady tooo.
--
...:::M.A.U.1.0.8:::... |
|
| reply to Ritz8
I used to get 305K steady with Rogers.
Do you have Sympatico Ultra?
--
"That Tommy Hilfiger pose, can't block my verbal flows" - Tachichi |
|
| reply to mau108
said by mau108:
hmm you guys should run tests from tucows server eh...
On nyc I get 1100-2000
but when I run my download test from tucows I get around 320-350 Kilobytes (2560-2800 kiloBITs) steady tooo.
I most definitely agree...I use a Tucows download as my test...This gives me a better idea of the Rogers Network.
5 55 ms 28 ms 28 msgw01.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81.178]
6 31 ms 29 ms 28 ms gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.210]
7 33 ms 29 ms 27 ms gw01.bloor.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.230]
8 54 ms 29 ms 29 ms gw02.bloor.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.250]
9 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms gw01.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.6]
10 32 ms 33 ms 29 ms gw02.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.138]
11 53 ms 34 ms 34 ms gw01.front.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.81.18]
12 34 ms 34 ms 29 ms 199.45.118.2
13 58 ms 34 ms 33 ms on-tor-frn-r75-01-fe0-0-0.look.ca [207.136.65.129]
14 61 ms 32 ms 34 ms on-tor-blr-r75-01-pos6-1-0.look.ca [207.136.65.173]
15 33 ms 33 ms 34 ms idirect.tucows.com [207.136.80.242]
C:\WINDOWS>tracert www.dslreports.com
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
11 46 ms 45 ms 47 ms 66.198.40.5
12 72 ms 45 ms 43 ms if-3-0.core1.Chicago3.teleglobe.net [63.243.177
2]
13 95 ms 69 ms 69 ms 204.255.169.17
14 72 ms 70 ms 70 ms 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.CHI2.ALTER.NET [152.63.68.194]
15 68 ms 69 ms 70 ms 0.so-2-0-0.TL2.CHI2.ALTER.NET [152.63.67.109]
16 64 ms 63 ms 63 ms 0.so-1-1-0.TL2.NYC8.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.158]
17 63 ms 64 ms 64 ms 0.so-1-2-0.XL2.NYC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.29.101]
18 69 ms 64 ms 64 ms 0.so-0-0-0.XR2.NYC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.97]
19 67 ms 64 ms 64 ms 508.ATM6-0.GW7.NYC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.25.77]
20 189 ms 166 ms 141 ms nac-nyc-gw1.customer.alter.net [157.130.9.142]
21 * 195 ms 165 ms dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete. |
|
mau108MauPremium
join:2001-10-07
Thornhill, ON | reply to OLDb34tBoX
said by b34tBoX:
I used to get 305K steady with Rogers.
Do you have Sympatico Ultra?
im on rogers.
--
...:::M.A.U.1.0.8:::... |
|
 elusionPremium
join:2001-10-25
Scarborough, ON | reply to Ritz8
MAu, you know your connection is good, you cant trust that stupid nyc server, its worthless sometimes, tucows is the best, I get my steady 320-330 on that, which I am really happy with. |
|
 xRAGEx
join:2002-02-18
Stoney Creek, ON
| reply to OLDb34tBoX
said by b34tBoX:
Join the club, I went from 3000/384k (Easily 300K+ d/l) to this: »/speedtests/12···25670213
Oh yeah, it was also mint when I "tweaked" my modem for a day. =]
2002-06-15 17:13:06 Speed test (nyc.speakeasy.net) 5228/361 kbps
I'd bet some of you remember that.
Craziest thing is, I used to have 48ms in Quake3 before the infamous cap, and still have 48ms after the cap.
"The dying words of a Rogers customer"
[text was edited by author 2002-07-03 00:29:34]
your pings are the same because online games, especially on the q3a engine, dont push your connection to its limits
the ping times to your phub, etc are what makes up your ping, and rogers didnt tamper with these... |
|
| reply to elusion
Mau108 and Green1074 got capped, what the hell are you guys talking about?..
Wait until I get my 3500/800, that outta shut you up. 
--
"That Tommy Hilfiger pose, can't block my verbal flows" - Tachichi |
|
elusionPremium
join:2001-10-25
Scarborough, ON
| B34tbox, that made no sense. When did I say I was capped? Please check into things before you open your mouth.
[text was edited by author 2002-07-04 00:32:28] |
|
mau108MauPremium
join:2001-10-07
Thornhill, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to OLDb34tBoX
said by b34tBoX:
Mau108 and Green1074 got capped, what the hell are you guys talking about?..
Wait until I get my 3500/800, that outta shut you up.
hmmm
please doo look into things before you open that big yap of yours.
Both me and Green have NOT been capped yet.
I do not know where you got all this false information from, but next time please doo look into things before stating such a comment. 
Thanks
--
...:::M.A.U.1.0.8:::... |
|
| reply to Ritz8
How about some screenshots from tucows when the file is completed I would like to see, "Download completed at 320-350K" please..Since you guys get 320-350K STEADY.
--
"That Tommy Hilfiger pose, can't block my verbal flows" - Tachichi |
|
elusionPremium
join:2001-10-25
Scarborough, ON | reply to Ritz8
Even if we aren't getting that when the file is completed, the fact is we aint capped are we, thats the fact, Since you know our connection sooooooooo well, to tell if we are capped or not, I just felt like telling you that well you were wrong. I get 320-330 while downloading, when the file has been completed, I have achieved a rate of 290-319.
--
In the game of Broadband, you always loose when you go the Rogers route.I'm not Canadian :P |
|
 ExitPremium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada | reply to Ritz8
Ok lets stay on topic here and keep away from personal attacks. I want screen shots!!!;)
Steve
--
18.98Ghz of Cancer killing power commin at yah. |
|
| reply to Ritz8
said by mrspec3:
Ok lets stay on topic here and keep away from personal attacks. I want screen shots!!!:)
Let's keep it honest fellas.
--
"That Tommy Hilfiger pose, can't block my verbal flows" - Tachichi |
|
