site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
66
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


skyjock41
Shag Diesel
Premium
join:2001-12-11
Patrick Afb, FL

IF ONLY

If only the judges hearing these cases used Kazaa or Napster then the shit would be different. I have boycotted buying music and havent bought a CD in 3 years due to 1 reason. 20 Dollars for a single hit and 10 WTF tracks. Kazaa will probably die and a new service will show up. P2P will never be touched. If thats the case they better take my god damn yahoo messenger away cause ill be swapping with it. Piss off record companies your losing and we are winning hahahhahahaha.


Klendathu

join:2002-02-24
Studio City, CA

said by skyjock41:
Kazaa will probably die and a new service will show up.
How very true. When Napster was getting pounded by the RIAA, a whole slew of new alternatives popped up to take its place. The p2p software are like cockroaches, if you kill them one at a time, you tend to neglect the fact that there are more just ready to take its place.

I don't think that the record industry will be able to sell a whole lot of mp3s, even if they charge just a quarter a song. I sure as hell won't buy those when I could just use Kazaa and download the songs for free. But if the cds were a bit cheaper ($8-10 each) and came with extras like the way DVDs do, that is something I would buy. The music would sound way better than an mp3 and you would now have extras that would present "value" to the customer. I laugh when the record industry defends their pricing of cds due to "perceived value" even though it costs them less to manufacture a cd versus a tape.

Monday, 04-Jun 14:19:52 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics