site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
49
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Phil
Rojo Sol
Premium
join:2001-06-11
Camarillo, CA
kudos:2

There is no argument against the RIAA

Simple put the RIAA has every right to action against anyone who is stealing there copyrighted material. I don't care if a CD is $18.00 and only costs a penny to manufacture and produce, it is theft when you swap files via the internet. Now prior to MP3 & broadband there was really no viable means of copying and distributing music other than cruising over to a buddies house and copying it there on the old stereo system. I highly doubt the RIAA even cared or noticed this activity.

Now you have mass distribution of copyrighted material worldwide and it's damn easy to get this stuff. I can assure that the music companies have felt this in the massive pockets with which they hold and they want to contain it as best they can. As would I.

I do know that if I were to produce something and people liked it that they would pay for it, not steal it.

This argument I just made is just common sense. I don't always abide by the rules, but just wanted to point the RIAA's perspective here.

Take care,

LPP
[text was edited by author 2002-07-06 00:04:32]

Monday, 04-Jun 14:20:46 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics