site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
91
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Former Canuck

Down here in the Los Angeles area, TimeWarner has already done that.
On Time Warner cable I have the following choices:
AOL BB - $$$$$$!
Road Runner -$49.95
Earthlink - $41.95

How about that. Even though TW owns the lines, its less expensive to use Earthlink, and it has the same UL/DL with more Web space and email!!!


Dodgeram01
They Call Me Dodger
Premium
join:2001-11-25
Carthage, NY

Well, as long as my service in upstate NY remains at least as good as it is, I'll remain a happy camper.
--
DODGEGrab Life By The Horns



nekote

join:2000-12-16
USA

reply to en102
I just don't get it.

What is the business sense of allowing a competitor offer a better cheaper package ($41.95/mo) over their own RR package ($49.95)?

In a "rational" marketplace, isn't RR / TW going to be forced to match / exceed the $41.95/mo price point / package in order to prevent its customers from migrating to Earthlink ???

I just don't get it !!!
--
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all other forms of government. - Winston Churchill


Monday, 04-Jun 14:24:57 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics