http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r3860838 en Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:40:38 EDT Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:40:38 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3870197 nekote : I just don't get it.

What is the business sense of allowing a competitor offer a better cheaper package ($41.95/mo) over their own RR package ($49.95)?

In a "rational" marketplace, isn't RR / TW going to be forced to match / exceed the $41.95/mo price point / package in order to prevent its customers from migrating to Earthlink ???

I just don't get it !!!
--
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all other forms of government. - Winston Churchill]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3870197 Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:15:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3861388 Dodgeram01 : Well, as long as my service in upstate NY remains at least as good as it is, I'll remain a happy camper.
--
DODGE Grab Life By The Horns ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3861388 Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:47:15 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3860838 en102 : Down here in the Los Angeles area, TimeWarner has already done that.
On Time Warner cable I have the following choices:
AOL BB - $$$$$$!
Road Runner -$49.95
Earthlink - $41.95

How about that. Even though TW owns the lines, its less expensive to use Earthlink, and it has the same UL/DL with more Web space and email!!!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,3860838 Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:43:37 EDT