republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal
AuthorAll Replies


SYNACK
Just Firewall It
Premium,Mod
join:2001-03-05
Venice, CA
Host:
Networking
Virtual Private Ne..
Netgear
ZyXEL

reply to garciamd

Re: Port 1025-1027

Sorry, but mynetwatchman did not start a flaming episode, and he is absolutely correct (and used the word flaming rhetorically). He was one of the few who saw the complete uselessness of the ongoing discussion.

If you would like us to interpret logs, we need:

1. Destination port
2. source port
3. protocol (UDP, TCP, etc)
4. packet direction (incoming, outgoing)
5. Any discernible pattern (every 5 minutes, i sets of 3, etc).

Your original question (and the title of this thread!) was about ports 1025-1027. Typically "getting hits on xx" means xx is the destination port. It took you 14 posts deep into this thread to enlighten us that the destination port was actually 137. Up to that point basically wasting everybody's time with irrelevant information (and in this case, source ports are pretty irrelevant!).

So, please recognize sincere help as such.
--
Where in the world is LA/OC ?


dja
The 'd' is silent ... unlike the member.
Premium
join:2002-03-25
Niagara

said by SYNACK:
He was one of the few who saw the complete uselessness of the ongoing discussion.
How was it useless?
Much useful info was posted
long before Larry arrived.
said by SYNACK:
It took you 14 posts deep into this thread to enlighten us that the destination port was actually 137.
In post (#8) I openly clarified what I had
correctly believed the member had meant.
He then confirmed this.
said by SYNACK:
Up to that point basically wasting everybody's time with irrelevant information.
What's irrelevant about the
links I posted in post (#5)?
said by SYNACK:
So, please recognize sincere help as such.
He did. Twice.

Granted the member was confused
about the source and destination ports,
but we knew with so much going on and
many threads already begun that this
member was dealing with NetBIOS Name requests.

Before you even posted, the member had
received all the information that was
required to understand what he was observing.
--
the "d" is silent - unlike the member

[text was edited by author 2002-10-02 01:57:36]


SYNACK
Just Firewall It
Premium,Mod
join:2001-03-05
Venice, CA
Host:
Networking
Virtual Private Ne..
Netgear
ZyXEL

Well, in a techical forum I typically don't rely on guessing and abstain from an interpretation based on incomplete data and up to that point you had to wildly guess. (At the same time it triggered a flood of the typical knee-jerk blackjack&Co. answers.)

There was nothing wrong with your links, but they were based on guesses and not on anything in the posts above it. (If you ask what is 2+2 and I answer "the sky is blue", I make a perfectly true statement (at least in california), but it is not related to the question).
There were (and still are) ongoing threads about the new 137/UDP epidemic (after all they biased your guess;)). If a new thread such as this is started I would rightfully assume a different topic until proven otherwise.

I really would encourage everybody to abstain from answering (=guessing) until all the vital facts are in. A final conclusion can never be better than the underlying data.


garciamd

join:2001-03-24
Whippany, NJ

reply to dja
Thank you dja, you hit in on the nose!!!
Now let's all go and take a coffee break.
Keep up the good work!


Sunday, 03-Jun 19:01:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics