demax4
join:2000-05-01
Fullerton, CA | reply to NYR 56
Tell that to Zdnet and other test centers. Speed wise your absolutely wrong. I did quite of bit of research before deciding to test it myself. Nowhere will it say that its faster, but just the opposite. It's a hog. It requires a lot more memory power. It requires more HD space. It runs more background applications. It requires a higher CPU usage & a faster CPU. It doesn't allow API functions. What about games ? Talk to the gamers 95 will blow away 98 and 98 will blow away ME. Go to the hackers sites and ask them what limits ME has imposed. If you got a secret you ought to share it with the rest of us. |
|
|
|
 NYR 56Premium
join:2000-12-05
Smithtown, NY | ME IS FASTER FOR ME. I dont care what you say, or what tests you show me, it performs better on my computer. I went from 98 to ME to 98 to ME, and it does do better.
BTW, I have an AMD Athlon (enhanced) 256mb SDRAM...
--
"Keep honking, I'm reloading!" |
|
| ME definately seems to be kinda sketchy.
Some hardware configs it loves, some it tolerates, and some it doesn't like at all. I've seen ME run perfectly on one machine, and error out/get BSOD constantly on another machine. *shrug* I guess I got lucky
--
...It's a little sketchy out there. |
|
