atoms join:2000-12-16 Chicago, IL |
atoms
Member
2003-Jan-22 8:54 am
cyberonic dns server(s)?Wow. I noticed the the link light was green on the Cyberonic supplied Speedstream router.
So of course I connected to it. I got a dhcp IP address but on the first attempt, I could not get out onto the internet. After powercycling the Speedstream, I can reach the internet!
HOWEVER, I still have the DNS servers hard coded in my network config which (I think) were supplied by DTV. They seemed to be flakey this morning even when I was connected via DTV which prompted me to try the Cyberonic circuit.
(Yes they are on separate lines so I have two dsl circuits coming into my crib!)
Anyway, over the Cyberonic connection the DNS seems even worse: "www.google.com cannot be found" makes the net nearly worthless.
Does anyone know what DNS servers Cyberonic customers can/should use? I am in Chicago.
Thank you for any suggestions or advice you may offer. |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 8:54 am · (locked) |
|
You can use UUNET's (wcom)at: 198.6.1.1 198.6.1.2 198.6.1.3 198.6.1.4 |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 9:28 am · (locked) |
|
dellerdslerThe Other Side Of The Drum join:2001-12-05 Berwyn, IL
|
to atoms
Suburbanite here from the west side... I use 198.6.1.5 and 4.2.49.2 as DNS servers for Cyberonic. Maybe they'll work for you. [text was edited by author 2003-01-22 14:19:15] |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 9:32 am · (locked) |
atoms join:2000-12-16 Chicago, IL |
atoms
Member
2003-Jan-22 10:59 am
twodogs and dellerdsler, Thank you! I can't wait to get home and try them out! |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 10:59 am · (locked) |
|
ross7
Member
2003-Jan-22 1:09 pm
Any idea if those servers are close to the West coast? Cyberonic set me up with 198.6.1.5 and 198.6.1.4. Half the time I'm being routed all over Canada to connect down the street. |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 1:09 pm · (locked) |
|
Cyberonic gave me the same as you 98.6.1.5 and 198.6.1.4, and I am in Mountain View. You can try 4.17.179.2 and 4.2.49.2. This is what my router was serving up via DHCP before they changed it to static IP and turned off the DHCP server. |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 1:27 pm · (locked) |
djrobx Premium Member join:2000-05-31 Reno, NV |
to atoms
Looks like .3 and .4 are west coast (San Jose, Portland), .1 is east coast (Wash, DC?) and .2 is DFW, Texas.
-- Rob |
actions · 2003-Jan-22 3:45 pm · (locked) |
|
to atoms
I'm from San Francisco and Cyberonic set me up with 198.6.1.5 and 198.6.1.4 for DNS server. Can anybody recommend a different DNS server to use for better connection and speed? |
actions · 2003-Jan-28 12:39 am · (locked) |
|
to atoms
I've tried 4.17.179.2 / 4.2.49.2 and 198.6.1.5 / 198.6.1.4
Both sets given to me by Cyberonic had me retrying most of my pages, not getting in until the first or second retry.
I'm in Northern Virginia and I put just the single DNS of 198.6.1.1 in my (wireless) router and all is flying now.
Quite happy with Cyberonic, though I missed the deal.
PayPal donations: dreduardbenes@yahoo.com |
actions · 2003-Feb-2 2:00 am · (locked) |
Hayward0 K A R - 1 2 0 C Premium Member join:2000-07-13 Key West, FL |
to atoms
You all might want to continue Cyberonic only posts over at the Cyberonic Forum » CYBERONIC INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS INCwhere there are currently over 400 post, and more ISP specific information. |
actions · 2003-Feb-2 1:15 pm · (locked) |
Fortson join:2000-11-09 San Mateo, CA |
So what are the best DNS to use in the SF bay area? |
actions · 2003-Feb-7 11:05 pm · (locked) |
|
I use 198.6.1.146 and 198.6.1.3 it's pretty quick. |
actions · 2003-Feb-8 1:46 am · (locked) |
|
San Jose CA
Anon
2003-Feb-17 5:57 pm
I'll second these settings. I've been up for about an hour now. Nice speeds! Speed test added to test archive. I wasn't having any DNS problems but I found that I could knock one hop (.4 to .3) and five hops (.142 to .146) off the DNS server settings they gave me resulting in a possibly slight improvement. |
actions · 2003-Feb-17 5:57 pm · (locked) |
kathan join:2002-12-27 Lake Zurich, IL |
kathan
Member
2003-Feb-18 10:39 am
I found some other UUNET DNS servers. I don't know where they are but the pings aren't that great from Chicago. Maybe they are better elsewhere.
198.6.1.65 - auth00.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.81 - auth01.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.82 - auth02.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.83 - auth03.ns.uu.net 195.129.12.82 - auth200.ns.uu.net 195.129.12.74 - auth210.ns.uu.net 137.39.1.3 - ns.uu.net |
actions · 2003-Feb-18 10:39 am · (locked) |
chex5 join:2000-05-24 NorthEnd BOS |
to twodogs
Hey guys, I am using # dialcache060.ns.uu.net Boston Worldcom DNS 20 ms nameserver 198.6.1.6 I am getting 18-20 ms ping times to this DNS server. It is here in Boston, so thats why. For anyone out of the Boston POP, this is the DNS server to use. I switched over everything here to use that as my primary DNS. -- Chex doin' some DNS research said by twodogs: You can use UUNET's (wcom)at: 198.6.1.1 198.6.1.2 198.6.1.3 198.6.1.4
|
actions · 2003-Feb-26 10:14 pm · (locked) |
juharris Premium Member join:2000-06-08 Bedford, MA |
juharris
Premium Member
2003-Feb-26 10:18 pm
I second 198.6.1.6 from the boston area. I get 15ms response. My secondary DNS server is setup to point to 198.6.1.122 (appears to be in NY) with 29ms response. said by chex5: Hey guys, I am using
# dialcache060.ns.uu.net Boston Worldcom DNS 20 ms nameserver 198.6.1.6
I am getting 18-20 ms ping times to this DNS server. It is here in Boston, so thats why. For anyone out of the Boston POP, this is the DNS server to use.
I switched over everything here to use that as my primary DNS.
-- Chex doin' some DNS researchsaid by twodogs: You can use UUNET's (wcom)at: 198.6.1.1 198.6.1.2 198.6.1.3 198.6.1.4
|
actions · 2003-Feb-26 10:18 pm · (locked) |
HAL6664 join:2003-01-15 Beverly Hills, CA |
to atoms
cache00.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.1 cache01.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.2 cache02.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.3 cache03.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.4 cache04.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.5 cache05.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.195 cache06.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.122 cache07.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.142 cache08.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.146
dialcache060.ns.uu.net 198.6.1.6
Ping to find the best for your location |
actions · 2003-Feb-26 11:10 pm · (locked) |