republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
62
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


enkid

@bose.com

harm?

Would the use of email in organizing a boycott of a telecommunications provider (perhaps the one which provided the email service) constitute "intent to harm" under these laws?

yazdzik
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-26
Honesdale, PA
kudos:1

said by enkid:
Would the use of email in organizing a boycott of a telecommunications provider (perhaps the one which provided the email service) constitute "intent to harm" under these laws?
Yes. Therein lies the danger. While it may not be the intention of the law, it is indeed so constructed. That is why words like "intent" need to be formulated clearly in the penal code - if the purpose of communication is to harm the telcos, and I, personally, would do anything in my power to harm them, short of violate statute, it is illegal in Michigan to do so via the internet, or a protocol involving the use of an IP address. Apparently, the Michigan legislature thinks that Bignet deserves to die because it is not Ma Bell, and, frankly, had the states and the federal government adhered to statute in the first place, Covad would never have landed in court, and few of us would still be using landline phones attached to ex-ATT copper.

Never underestimate the power of corruption.

An e-mail demanding a telco boycott in Michigan is now a felony.

-M

Monday, 04-Jun 09:33:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics