republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
59
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


keyboard5684
Sam

join:2001-08-01
Pittsburgh, PA
Reviews:
·Armstrong Zoom ..

Not Exactly

It is not possible to require everyone to stop using NAT or firewalls. It looks like that's what they are trying to get at but I think its being misread.

The internet currently could not support everyone, or even a portion of users, to stop using NAT. There really is not that many IP addresses to go around if that were to happen. NAT was generally designed to help prolong the current IP resources.

The requirement for you to stop using your firewall or modify it to be open even for certain users would threaten the internet as a whole. This would provoke the federal government to get involved further.

This does need to be reviewed more because its apparent that many are taking the wording one way and some the other. I think its much easier for a judge issuing a warrant, that usually does not have a strong technical background, to mis-understand the legal documentation on this issue. It really does give the wrong people the advantage to use the bills towards there advantage.

Monday, 04-Jun 09:33:34 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics