site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

rachelhunter

join:2003-04-08
Pensacola, FL

reply to macyh

Re: What about forced telco bundling?

I have no problem with bundling: I get Complete Choice, DSL, Unlimited Long Distance for about $115 a month. The argument here is that Comcast raised rates 33% for non-cable High-Speed customers. Isn't it $55 for non and $40 for cable customers? It is only $5 difference for DSL with my Telco (but I have to have the package to get true unlimited long distance so don't mind it.) If anything, I think Cable needs some regulation. As far as Telcos sharing their DSL, why should they? Cable has far more subscribers and IS the competition. I'll go with the local Bell everytime. Do you really think, if I wanted it, I would have some bozo install a T-1 line in my house without a Bell sign on his uniform? No, I don't think so. I don't have Comcast, but think most cable outfits are getting to be a rip-off. I found Dish to be a far better deal.

Sunday, 03-Jun 10:28:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics