ricep5Premium
join:2000-08-07
Jacksonville, FL | They can't catch Virtual PC They may catch how many hosts are NAT'ng on a router, but can they catch how many Virtual PC's you are running on your one PC?
I am getting worried about some of the "reactionary" headlines appearing here on BBR. Like John Dvorak on PCMAG, they seem to want to provoke you into posting instead of just providing the information. As John found out this week, just having PORN in your topic creates a 25% jump in reads and responses.
BBR is getting to be a The Paranoid Report at times. |
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| said by ricep5:
They may catch how many hosts are NAT'ng on a router, but can they catch how many Virtual PC's you are running on your one PC?
If you're running something that truly makes virtual machines, like VMware or VirtualPC, yes.
I like that to enable scrubbing I just have to add one line to my OpenBSD firewall config. Those guys are so nice. |
|
 beerbumobscurum per obscuriusPremium
join:2000-05-06
Eastern PA | said by sporkme:
I like that to enable scrubbing I just have to add one line to my OpenBSD firewall config. Those guys are so nice.
yup.. if this should ever become an issue I can just toss my linksys router and compile a recent version of IPFilter on my sparc.
Just like the RIAA fails to understand why they are and will lose the file-sharing battle, tracking down NAT will also be a losing battle, only because the Internet - as it was originally designed to do - will "route around" any "damage".
--
Even if you are anti-war.. You are still an "Infidel", and Bin Laden wants you dead too. |
|
