 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | joy price war = good for us. 
let the blood letting begin! |
|
 saber11Check SixPremium join:2000-06-09 Clayton, OH | said by morbo: price war = good for us. 
let the blood letting begin!
Not if they do what Roadrunner is doing, imposing a 15gig a month cap on combined uploads and downloads with a $12.50 surcharge for every 5gig over.
Sure they may lower the prices, but the capman cometh bringing higher fees. -- Just when you thought it was safe to get back in the gene pool. |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | said by saber11: Not if they do what Roadrunner is doing, imposing a 15gig a month cap on combined uploads and downloads with a $12.50 surcharge for every 5gig over.
Sure they may lower the prices, but the capman cometh bringing higher fees.
is dsl an option for you? no caps at all, and no slowdowns like cable. vote with your $ -- We'll be incredibly lucky to make it out of this decade without an attack that dwarfs 9/11 due to the current U.S. led war. |
|
 | reply to morbo There's no price war if you can't get DSL. That's a huge percentage of the INNER INNER INNER INNER INNER URBAN(and SUBURBAN) population. DSL availability is barely over 50% in major metro areas. Cable knows this so there's no reason for them to participate in the price war. They will get 100% of the market that can't get DSL and probably 40% of the market at least that can. With those market share numbers, they will easily beat out DSL and be far more profitable doing it. Unless DSL engages in the strategy I suggest THEY WILL LOSE. I'm right and everybody else is wrong. |
|
|
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | said by 2farfromCO7: There's no price war if you can't get DSL.
true. if dsl pushes the 'no caps' 'servers allowed' 'cheaper service' 'no primetime slow downs' buttons, then they will win over cable. -- We'll be incredibly lucky to make it out of this decade without an attack that dwarfs 9/11 due to the current U.S. led war. |
|
 | reply to saber11 Exactly, if DSL was available to 100% of their customers, they could never get away with this. These policies prove that there is no price war and it's completely due to the fact that DSL isn't available. |
|
 | reply to morbo WRONG!!!! They need to do just the opposite. They need to push NO MINIMUM SPEED GUARANTEED and ANYTIME SLOWDOWN WITHOUT WARNING DUE TO LINE CONDITIONS(NOT TRAFFIC) BUTTON. The only way they can beat cable is by offering DSL AS IS(WITHOUT RTs) over 12000ft(which is the limit of SBC, no matter what they tell you, at least in the AmeriCRAP region). |
|
 | said by 2farfromCO7: WRONG!!!! They need to do just the opposite. They need to push NO MINIMUM SPEED GUARANTEED and ANYTIME SLOWDOWN WITHOUT WARNING DUE TO LINE CONDITIONS(NOT TRAFFIC) BUTTON. The only way they can beat cable is by offering DSL AS IS(WITHOUT RTs) over 12000ft(which is the limit of SBC, no matter what they tell you, at least in the AmeriCRAP region).
Oh take heed everyone - Here is the answer. Lets just make a sh*t offer (take it or leave it). Yeah that will go over real well, then all the DSL companies and then ALL the Cable Co's can do the same. Meanwhile we can watch our service and support go down the toilet.
Murdok610 |
|
 saber11Check SixPremium join:2000-06-09 Clayton, OH | reply to morbo said by morbo:
is dsl an option for you? no caps at all, and no slowdowns like cable. vote with your $
Nope, crappy phone lines where I live no DSL I already tried that route. -- Just when you thought it was safe to get back in the gene pool. |
|
 | reply to 2farfromCO7 Dude, you need to keep taking your prozac!!
Why don't you start up a local neighborhood ISP/WISP? Doing so would take half the time you spend whining on here about distance limitations. |
|
 | reply to 2farfromCO7 said by 2farfromCO7: I'm right and everybody else is wrong.
Wow....2 1/2 years....and still ranting. |
|
 | reply to murdok6100 It's a helluva lot better than 28.8. I never said the cable companies will do the same. They don't have to. Their service is far more available. This will only get them to stop raising their prices for internet only customers and placing download caps. If they know that virtually all of their customers can switch to DSL for less, that will start a price war. |
|
 HallPremium,MVM join:2000-04-28 Dayton, OH kudos:1 | reply to morbo DSL will have bandwidth caps someday... It's inevitable. |
|
 | reply to ntguru911 I'm going to as soon as I get enough spots(I plan on using customers apartments as spots to put them so I get the "right of way" for free) to put access point amplifiers in. Right now I only have about 150 potential customers within range. None of these people can get any form of broadband access so I'll be the only game in town. However I need to be able the entire 400 unit complex in order to get enough customers. I will charge $40/month, require just a 5 month contract, and also push Vonage or other VOIP service to really stick it to SBC AmeriCRAP. |
|
 | reply to Hall I checked.... no caps.  |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | reply to 2farfromCO7 That would have to be dirt cheap.
I wouldn't pay $30 a month for "Pure crap when it works, and half the time it doesn't" DSL.
Maybe at $19.95 if NO OTHER CHOICE.... but that's it. |
|
 | So you consider 384 to be "pure crap"? I would consider even 256 to be beyond stellar. People pay $23.90 for AOL dial-up(clearly you wouldn't). Why wouldn't they pay $24.95 for a mostly on 384k service? |
|
 | reply to 2farfromCO7 Have you looked into the various higher gain omni-directional antenna out there? I use a 7dBi omni on my AP and it extends my range (from a "normal" wifi PCMCIA card) by about 3 times. What kind of penetration % do you expect to get?
I had no BB for about a year and I went nuts. I finally used ISDN (which was a huge improvement BTW) and was getting ready to order a T1 for about $350/mo when we decided to move instead. |
|
 jdmurrayPremium join:2001-03-02 Huntington Beach, CA Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Hall said by Hall: DSL will have bandwidth caps someday... It's inevitable.
It's happening now, thanks to the ISPs.
I have a 1500/128 Verizon DSL line. A few days ago I noticed my upstream speed was only about 25% of what it typically is (~30kps vs. ~115kbps). I contacted Verizon and they said everything on my line was great and I was actually getting better than 128. I called my ISP and discovered that a router "throttling mechanism" had kicked in because I was using at least 80% of my upstream bandwidth 24/7 (you can guess what kind of software I run).
The explanation for this occurrence was that I wasn't being a good "DSL Citizen" for constantly using all of my upstream bandwidth. Although I am paying for 128 the fair usage policy of my ISP says that I am not allowed to use it as much as I want because this would be too expensive for the ISPs to support (although they seem to care nothing of my continuous, massive downstream usage).
I am not complaining about this, but I did tell them that I wished that they had sent me a courtesy email explaining the situation to me before their capping mechanism kicked in. |
|
 borvOnemhz On Aim join:2000-10-06 Astoria, NY | get speakeasy- $89/month for 1.5/384
they dont care what you do - servers 24.7 , host hard core porn sites, whatever. |
|