<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>What&#x27;s With This Again? in Mediacom</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r6836164</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:16:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:16:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971298</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/675675"><b>linux</b></A> : Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    13 ms    18 ms    15 ms  10.17.0.1<br>  2    13 ms    12 ms    11 ms  12.215.14.1<br>  3    87 ms    74 ms    70 ms  12.215.1.114<br>  4    41 ms    39 ms    47 ms  gbr5-p80.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.5.218]<br>  5    69 ms    77 ms   100 ms  tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]<br>  6   167 ms   165 ms   135 ms  tbr1-p013601.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.57]<br>  7     *      166 ms   155 ms  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]<br>  8    93 ms    81 ms   153 ms  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]<br>  9    82 ms    82 ms    64 ms  0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.233]<br> 10   164 ms   151 ms   186 ms  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]<br> 11   120 ms    68 ms    74 ms  www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br>Mine haven't been the greatest either.  Oh well.   Better than 900ms I suppose :)   <SMALL>--<br><B> MOS 31F - MOS 31U  1991-1999 </B></SMALL><br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-29 00:44:54]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6971298</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 00:44:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6970621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/480892"><b>z9_87</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  marigolds <A HREF="/useremail/u/629959"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Probably all the students done with finals using the net in combination with everyone doing last minute paper research :)<br>(assuming SD State has finals this week like a lot of other schools).<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>speaking of this...  Today in one of my finals at school, the whole class was on the computer.  (the final was on the computer)  Everyone was using the internet at once.  Now my school only has 1 T1 for all 3 schools.  So every computer in our lab at the high school was being used plus some at the other 2 schools I'm sure.  Talk about slowwww.  1min+ for each page to load.  Made the thing take forever!  It was pretty funny to watch people keep reloading though only to have to wait longer.<br><small>--<br>Lag free since 5/15/03!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6970621</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 23:32:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6854495</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/629959"><b>marigolds</b></A> : Probably all the students done with finals using the net in combination with everyone doing last minute paper research :)<br>(assuming SD State has finals this week like a lot of other schools).<br><small>--<br>ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet<BR>telnet://whip.isca.uiowa.edu<BR>or Go to<BR> &raquo;<A HREF="http://isca.whiteboard.net" >isca.whiteboard.net</A> for more information (and java telnet access)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6854495</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 22:22:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853917</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/608120"><b>Dogbert</b></A> : Hey, I just noticed that my 4th, 5th and 6th Hop now have a different router that they go through for DSL reports.<br><br>Hop 4 changed from St. Louis to Minneapolis<br>Hop 5 changed from St. Louis to Chicago<br>Hop 6 changed from Washington, DC to New York<br><br>First time I've ever had these new routers.  I wonder what's up with that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853917</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 21:16:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853851</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/608120"><b>Dogbert</b></A> : Well, I'm hoping mine was a glitch.  It's been really good the last two nights.<br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    14 ms   10 ms    27 ms  10.18.xxx.1<br>  2   10 ms    14 ms    13 ms  12.xxx.17.161<br>  3    28 ms    14 ms    13 ms  12.xxx.5.166<br>  4    27 ms    41 ms    14 ms  gar1-p370.mpsmn.ip.att.net <br>  5    28 ms    27 ms    28 ms  gbr6-p30.cgcil.ip.att.net <br>  6    55 ms    41 ms    41 ms  tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net <br>  7   109 ms    42 ms    55 ms  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net <br>  8    55 ms    55 ms    54 ms  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net <br>  9    55 ms    82 ms    69 ms  1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net <br> 10    55 ms    55 ms    55 ms  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net <br> 11    55 ms    54 ms    97 ms  www.dslreports.com ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853851</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 21:09:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853082</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/480892"><b>z9_87</b></A> : hmmm... all i can say is WOW!<br><br>  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  2   166 ms    85 ms    30 ms  10.17.168.1<br>  3   434 ms   246 ms   106 ms  12.215.14.33<br>  4   449 ms   384 ms   169 ms  12.215.1.118<br>  5   354 ms   419 ms   548 ms  gbr6-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.6]<br>  6   395 ms   313 ms   252 ms  tbr2-p013601.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.61]<br>  7   288 ms   329 ms   232 ms  ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37]<br>  8   254 ms   298 ms   282 ms  dcr1-so-3-3-0.Chicago.cw.net [208.175.10.93]<br>  9   117 ms   103 ms   235 ms  dcr2-loopback.Washington.cw.net [206.24.226.100]<br><br> 10   374 ms   170 ms   259 ms  bhr1-pos-10-0.Sterling1dc2.cw.net [206.24.238.16<br>6]<br> 11   415 ms   400 ms   158 ms  csr11-ve242.Sterling2dc3.cw.net [216.109.66.99]<br><br> 12   358 ms   339 ms   248 ms  216.109.84.162<br> 13    74 ms   214 ms   188 ms  vl31.bas2-m.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.120.146]<br> 14   430 ms   403 ms   270 ms  w20.www.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.125.73]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><small>--<br>Lag free since 4/30/03!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6853082</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 19:38:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6837341</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/364778"><b>Thrawn2</b></A> : yeah my pings have also been having little problems. PHASE II should be here pretty soon. <br><small>--<br>If i had the money i would do COKE.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6837341</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 01:23:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836770</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/756330"><b>HTHIS</b></A> : NO mine have been awful MY first hop is really high again this has been going on for a few days<br><br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    76 ms   146 ms    32 ms  10.17.0.1<br>  2    76 ms   163 ms    87 ms  12.215.14.1<br>  3   196 ms   131 ms    52 ms  12.215.4.66<br>  4   225 ms   144 ms   145 ms  gbr5-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.2]<br>  5    26 ms    92 ms    47 ms  tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]<br>  6    64 ms    72 ms    48 ms  tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.1]<br>  7    90 ms   176 ms    96 ms  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]<br>  8    91 ms   121 ms   125 ms  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]<br>  9    71 ms    94 ms   141 ms  1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]<br><br> 10   153 ms    94 ms   112 ms  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]<br> 11    98 ms   113 ms   170 ms  www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><br>Trace complete.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836770</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 23:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836610</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/708172"><b>podunk</b></A> : normal here too....<br><br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    11 ms    13 ms    11 ms  10.16.16.1<br>  2     9 ms     7 ms    10 ms  12.215.13.33<br>  3    22 ms    22 ms    24 ms  12.215.6.22<br>  4    21 ms    26 ms    22 ms  gbr5-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.2]<br>  5    24 ms    27 ms    25 ms  tbr1-p013501.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.41]<br>  6    41 ms    46 ms    82 ms  tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.1]<br>  7    71 ms    41 ms    42 ms  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]<br>  8    44 ms    44 ms    42 ms  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]<br>  9    48 ms    43 ms    50 ms  1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]<br><br> 10    43 ms    45 ms    50 ms  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]<br> 11    42 ms    62 ms    46 ms  www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><small>--<br>"Don't be so humble - you are not that great."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836610</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 23:33:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836204</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/642841"><b>Zshen</b></A> : Mine are normal...<br><br>traceroute to dslreports.com (209.123.109.175), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets<br> 1  10.16.180.1 (10.16.180.1)  14.238 ms  37.942 ms  11.346 ms<br> 2  12.215.13.33 (12.215.13.33)  22.245 ms  13.735 ms  43.8 ms<br> 3  12.215.6.22 (12.215.6.22)  22.829 ms  22.508 ms  83.116 ms<br> 4  gbr6-p90.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.123.6.6)  30.749 ms  26.731 ms  74.34 ms<br> 5  tbr1-p013601.cgcil.ip.att.net (12.122.11.45)  34.812 ms  27.427 ms  24.615 ms<br> 6  tbr1-p012301.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.10.1)  44.221 ms  52.236 ms  53.16 ms<br> 7  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net (12.123.214.181)  43.959 ms  79.832 ms  105.161 ms<br> 8  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net (12.119.140.30)  45.732 ms  49.759 ms  44.477 ms<br> 9  1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net (209.123.11.202)  83.63 ms  47.588 ms  44.669 ms<br>10  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net (64.21.102.2)  88.373 ms  44.516 ms  44.213 ms<br>.....<br><small>--<br>"The most overlooked advantage of owning a computer is that if they foul up there's no law against whacking them around a bit."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836204</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 22:49:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What&#x27;s With This Again?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/608120"><b>Dogbert</b></A> : Anyone else having poor speeds and latency tonight?  I've been doing very, very well for the past two months.  Tonight though my tracerts and speeds look EXACTLY like they used to when a lot of us were having all the problems earlier in the year.<br><br>Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1   10 ms    14 ms    13 ms  10.18.xxx.1<br>  2    14 ms    14 ms    13 ms  12.xxx.17.161<br>  3    42 ms    41 ms    69 ms  12.xxx.5.162<br>  4   425 ms   399 ms   425 ms  gbr2-p57.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.198.70]<br>  5   425 ms   412 ms   412 ms  tbr1-p012602.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.11.101]<br>  6   316 ms   330 ms   329 ms  tbr1-p012401.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.65]<br>  7   302 ms   329 ms   371 ms  tbr1-p012201.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.10.17]<br>  8   439 ms   440 ms   439 ms  gar1-p3100.nwrnj.ip.att.net [12.123.214.181]<br>  9   453 ms   440 ms   453 ms  att.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.nwr.nac.net [12.119.140.30]<br> 10   357 ms   357 ms   330 ms  1189.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.202]<br> 11   425 ms   495 ms   466 ms  0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]<br> 12   453 ms   467 ms   453 ms  www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]<br><br>I hope it's just a glitch.  I don't think I can take going back to the way it used to be again.<br>Any help out there?<br><i>[text was edited by author 2003-05-13 22:47:50]</i><br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,6836164</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 22:45:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
