republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Benji21126

join:2002-12-04
Mount Juliet, TN

reply to unliterate

Re: whats this mean for current comcast pro customers

Who knows, but i know they have been upgrading where i live. My Internet -pro STUNK for the first 8 months, but to comcast's crdit, they didnt make me pay for it. Now, i am rock solid 384/3.5 but i should be, as internet pro here is 95.00 a month Hopefully, they will give us an option of internet Super Duper pro, at around 1.5 up, and 10 mb down, for 125.00 a month. after all they only charge 39.00 for 1.5/256

But good news is, they are definately upgrading here. should, i screamed loud enough.

Happy with internet pro now, but would like more upload for gamming


b1gdr3
I Blame Your Mother

join:2001-07-28
York, PA

said by Benji21126:
Hopefully, they will give us an option of internet Super Duper pro, at around 1.5 up, and 10 mb down, for 125.00 a month.
That's a totally unrealistic price point. You want them to add 6.5mb down and 1.1mb up for 30 dollars more? Have you ever even run a business? Bandwidth isn't free for anyone....to support 10mb/1.5 would be a hell of a lot more than $125...and you don't need more than 384 up, unless you are running some crappy game server.
--
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.

scottj1

join:2001-11-24
Claymont, DE

With regard to the comment "and you don't need more than 384 up, unless you are running some crappy game server" you are mistaken. There are remote administrative tasks that are done on some large networks that run slow at 384, and considerable better at 10MB plus. Perhaps you ahould re-evaluate before posting on things you may not understand.


wsjo

join:2000-11-11
Los Angeles, CA

reply to b1gdr3
Well, Korean Telecom is offering VDSL (13 Mbps download) for 50,000 Won which is around $40 to $45. And they've been running the business for long time. It looks like the bandwidth is free for them.



b1gdr3
I Blame Your Mother

join:2001-07-28
York, PA

reply to scottj1

said by scottj1:
There are remote administrative tasks that are done on some large networks that run slow at 384, and considerable better at 10MB plus.
Better suited for a business line and not your residential line. Nuff said.
--
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.


jbgroup1
Non Conformist
Premium
join:2000-05-04
Dayton, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Benji21126

No one can be too rich.

When I first got broadband four years ago I had 1500/384kbps DSL. Two years later that seemed slow. After having COMCAST Pro speeds for a year I have gotten used to it and it doesn't seem as fast as it did when I first got it. I currently pay US$95 for COMCAST Pro at 3500/384kbps and I am still looking for something faster. I would gladly pay up to US$150 for 10/1.5Mbps (up/down) and I would pay more for faster speeds. While the upload speed isn't all that important to me I would really like to have as much download bandwidth as possible. As the saying goes "...[one] can never be too rich...and [one] can never have too much bandwidth."


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

said by jbgroup1:
When I first got broadband four years ago I had 1500/384kbps DSL. Two years later that seemed slow. After having COMCAST Pro speeds for a year I have gotten used to it and it doesn't seem as fast as it did when I first got it. I currently pay US$95 for COMCAST Pro at 3500/384kbps and I am still looking for something faster. I would gladly pay up to US$150 for 10/1.5Mbps (up/down) and I would pay more for faster speeds. While the upload speed isn't all that important to me I would really like to have as much download bandwidth as possible. As the saying goes "...[one] can never be too rich...and [one] can never have too much bandwidth."
Forget EVER getting 1500kbps upload. the current system cable uses only has 4.6mbps(after overhead) on each node. that would mean three users uploading would saturate the upload channel and others download rates would fall and latency would increase. DOCSIS 2.0 alleviates this somewhat but only adds 10mbps to the upload channel. want 1.5mbps up either get a T1 or if u can get it i believe Speakeasy offers up to 1.5mbps upload (sysadmin/god packages) of course if you cant get DSL that point is moot.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth


jbgroup1
Non Conformist
Premium
join:2000-05-04
Dayton, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

Well like I said I'd really like to have the download speed. I don't run servers and pretty much just download large files form work and surf the internet and check e-mail. If it weren't for having to download large files from work I could probably get by with "dial-up". NOT!!.


Aspire3

join:2003-02-09
Saint Louis, MO

reply to wsjo

Re: whats this mean for current comcast pro customers

"Well, Korean Telecom is offering VDSL (13 Mbps download) for 50,000 Won which is around $40 to $45. And they've been running the business for long time. It looks like the bandwidth is free for them."
___________________________________________________________

Korean networks were subsidized by their governments. So, yes, the bandwidth was very cheap for them.


markinpa

join:2000-12-30
Doylestown, PA

reply to b1gdr3
RE: "Better suited for a business line and not your residential line. Nuff said."

No, not "nuff said". They have the infastructure and the means to deliver higher speeds than what they're offering. If we the CUSTOMERS, business or residential, have the willingness to PAY for it, so be it!

Some people like in homes that are large enough to be department stores, does that mean it SHOULD be a department store? No, it's still a home. So super high speeds should only be reserved for businesses? Why? Why can't that gap be bridged? Long gone SHOULD be the days when the little guy had dial up and the amazons of the world used T1-T3. Even the biggest companies cqan benefit from their customers having higher bandwidth.


Sunday, 03-Jun 13:40:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics