<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[iO] iO boxes in OptimumOnline</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r7397790</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:27:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/516852"><b>milillo99</b></A> : I thought the 4200 just gives you component video hookups and USB port, the 4200HD gives you HDTV functionality, but other than that, I think they are the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400878</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:53:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400377</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/233016"><b>RickNY</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Tha ReAlEsT <A HREF="/useremail/u/695462"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>4200 is more advance, but i guess the 1850 is tolerable for now <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>What exactly do you think is more advanced about the 4200 than the 1850?   I can tell you -- they both do the same thing.. But Im curious why you think the 4200 does more.<br><small>--<br>"Make it idiot-proof and someone will build a better idiot."  |   <A HREF="http://www.google.com">Do you, uh, Google?</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400377</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:00:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/695462"><b>Tha ReAlEsT</b></A> : SA 1850, is a low quality box made for Cablevision and bronx/brooklyn. 4200 is more advance, but i guess the 1850 is tolerable for now]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7400144</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:33:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7398091</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/516852"><b>milillo99</b></A> : there are however two versions of the 1850, there are the ones with the S-video and digital audio coax, and the ones without.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7398091</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:25:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7397932</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/233016"><b>RickNY</b></A> : Nothing to upgrade unless you have an HDTV set -- 1850 is standard issue in Bronx & Brooklyn.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7397932</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:02:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[iO] iO boxes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7397790</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826698"><b>colossus770</b></A> : Is the SA 4200 the newest box? I just got iO and it came with an SA Explorer 1850. Is this newer, the same, or should I look to upgrade?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7397790</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:39:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
