Re: Not sure if this is true. in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r7590268 en Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:05:52 EDT Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:05:52 EDT Re: Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7590268 purplejello : I think that was a little bit harsh... But very funny :-)

(I believe you WizKid. The story is plausible, and I've had many run-ins with inept administations...)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7590268 Tue, 05 Aug 2003 00:05:56 EDT Re: Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7586658 wizkid6 : Sorry!!!!! I ment 03. However, do not think it didn't happen. It really happened]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7586658 Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:43:01 EDT Re: Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7585634 aztecnology :
said by wizkid6 See Profile:

In the spring of '02...
Shortly after opening Internet Exploder, the laptop started to lose sync constantly. This laptop was, keep in mind, using Intel's Centrino mobile technology...
Because of this, I will never, ever invest in wireless technology. It is very evident from the above statement that 802.11x is not ready for mass adoption.


Intel Centrino was only made available this march, one year later than the timing your alleged story suggests...
--
.:|:. Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch it to be sure.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7585634 Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:52:33 EDT Re: Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7584856 anon : A centrino in spring of 02 ?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7584856 Mon, 04 Aug 2003 14:19:47 EDT Re: Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7584337 wizkid6 :
said by russotto See Profile:
One slow user will certainly increase latency, but throughput for the faster points should not be affected.


Yes, it will increase latency, but throughout will be affected, at least from my experience. Being a recent graduate from high school, here's a case in point:

In the spring of '02, my local high school (Clarke Central) got a Cisco Aironet 350 Series Wireless Ethernet Bridge, and attempted to use it with their existing Compaq (now HP) N1000v laptops. My science teacher (Alexander Powell) had a cart chock-full of the above laptops (including the access point) wheeled into the classroom. Once the laptop was handed to me, I turned it on, and logged in.

Shortly after opening Internet Exploder, the laptop started to lose sync constantly. This laptop was, keep in mind, using Intel's Centrino mobile technology. As much as I struggled to make it resync (including rebooting the laptop a gazillion times), it wouldn't sync back up. Go figure.

They also recently switched to Dell, but they're only giving Dell laptops to the teachers that don't currently have laptops. Those that already have (Compaq) laptops have to suffer through the problems that they have, including students. Ouch. What a poor decision Clarke County made. They should have waited until they had the money to give all the teachers new laptops, not just teachers that didn't have them.

The sad thing is that they blamed me for it that day. Only the next day did they realize it wasn't my fault.

Because of this, I will never, ever invest in wireless technology. It is very evident from the above statement that 802.11x is not ready for mass adoption.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7584337 Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:24:25 EDT Not sure if this is true. http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7582830 russotto : IIRC, 802.11a,b, and g can run in several modes, and only one of them does the "equal access" thing. One slow user will certainly increase latency (because they'll be taking longer when they have the hotspot), but throughput for the faster points should not be affected.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,7582830 Mon, 04 Aug 2003 09:44:34 EDT