 MaxxxtPeculiar Mental TwistPremium
join:2001-06-12
Denver, CO | How's the ping and routing with Britsys? Hello, I have been looking at switching to Britsys for DSL service here in Denver, CO. Is there anyone that has service here with Britsys that could post their Pings and routing? The price(cable buster) is almost too good to be true, with no guarantee on max latency or low pings. So I am trying to snoop a little, any help would be appreciated.
MAXXXT |
|
 WDI
join:2002-07-21
Edmonds, WA | I am 9700 feet from the CO getting on average 1300/635
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms (Firewall)
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms xx.xx.xx.xx.uu.net (Cisco 678)
3 16 ms 15 ms 14 ms 207.251.160.181
4 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms 207.251.176.6
5 16 ms 16 ms 15 ms 50.atm5-1.vr1.sea4.alter.net [137.39.207.97]
6 18 ms 17 ms 17 ms 254.atm2-0.xr1.sea4.alter.net [152.63.107.186]
7 17 ms 16 ms 17 ms 0.so-0-0-0.xl1.sea4.alter.net [152.63.107.234]
8 17 ms 18 ms 17 ms 0.so-7-0-0.tl1.sea1.alter.net [152.63.2.130]
9 36 ms 36 ms 35 ms 0.so-2-0-0.tl1.scl2.alter.net [152.63.1.13]
10 35 ms 35 ms 36 ms 0.so-7-0-0.xl1.pao1.alter.net [152.63.54.133]
11 38 ms 39 ms 38 ms pos6-0.gw6.pao1.alter.net [152.63.55.9]
12 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms wcggige-gw.customer.alter.net [157.130.30.142]
13 36 ms 38 ms 35 ms 64.200.210.185
14 105 ms 105 ms 109 ms 64.200.240.97
15 98 ms 98 ms 97 ms snfcca1wcx3-oc48.wcg.net [64.200.199.78]
16 104 ms 108 ms 104 ms dnvrco1wcx2-pos3-0.wcg.net [64.200.240.93]
17 98 ms 98 ms 97 ms chcgil1wcx3-pos15-0.wcg.net [64.200.210.65]
18 104 ms 107 ms 104 ms 64.200.236.18
19 105 ms 113 ms 105 ms nycmny2wcx3-pos5-0.wcg.net [64.200.210.110]
20 103 ms 107 ms 103 ms nycmnyhlce1-oc48.wcg.net [64.200.87.110]
21 104 ms 104 ms 107 ms nycmny2lce1-netaccess-atm.wcg.net [64.200.86.150]
22 105 ms 106 ms 107 ms 1187.at-0-1-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net [209.123.11.150]
23 98 ms 100 ms 98 ms 0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net [64.21.102.2]
24 99 ms 98 ms 98 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
- - - - - - - - - -
Pinging dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=44
Reply from 209.123.109.175: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=44
Ping statistics for 209.123.109.175:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 97ms, Maximum = 101ms, Average = 98ms |
|
 britsysBritsys.Net Support
join:2000-08-28
New York, NY | reply to Maxxxt
Tracert from North Carolina to Denver POP
I beleive that all UUNET traffic leaves Denver via St. Louis, MS. Its just the UUNET topology.
16 ms 31 ms 15 ms gw.support.britsys.com
15 ms 32 ms 15 ms gw-eth0-1-inflow-rdu.britsys.net [216.183.103.1]
16 ms 31 ms 16 ms gw-cat1-inflow-rdu.britsys.net [66.45.4.154]
16 ms 31 ms 16 ms rdu01-inflow-br01-pc1-11.rdu01.inflow.net [64.244.31.33]
15 ms 31 ms 16 ms 500.POS2-2.GW5.RDU1.ALTER.NET [157.130.40.197]
31 ms 15 ms 32 ms 230.at-5-0-0.CL1.RDU1.ALTER.NET [152.63.35.178]
31 ms 31 ms 32 ms 0.so-0-0-0.TL1.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.38.69]
78 ms 79 ms 78 ms 0.so-1-0-0.TL1.SLT4.ALTER.NET [152.63.1.157]
78 ms 94 ms 94 ms 0.so-4-1-0.CL1.DEN4.ALTER.NET [152.63.92.237]
78 ms 94 ms 93 ms 250.ATM2-0.VR1.DEN4.ALTER.NET [152.63.93.105]
Ping from NC to customer in Denver, CO
Pinging x.x.x.x with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51
Reply from x.x.x.x: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for x.x.x.x:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 94ms, Average = 93ms |
|
 Soapm
join:2001-07-15
Aurora, CO | said by britsys:
Tracert from North Carolina to Denver POP
I beleive that all UUNET traffic leaves Denver via St. Louis, MS. Its just the UUNET topology.
Why would they do this when UUNET has two major access points in Denver? One is downtown and the other is in DTC. |
|
Reviews:
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Maxxxt
I am in San diego, they use uunet here as well.
[root@linux root]# mtr -c 20 --report www.dslreports.com
HOST LOSS RCVD SENT BEST AVG WORST
local net info deleted..
207.251.160.175 0% 20 20 13.94 17.26 29.07
207.251.172.103 0% 20 20 13.97 16.61 19.50
50.ATM5-1.VR1.LAX4.ALTER.NET 0% 20 20 14.52 17.13 19.70
257.at-3-0-0.HR1.LAX9.ALTER.NET 0% 20 20 15.26 18.55 22.53
0.so-2-1-0.XL1.LAX9.ALTER.NET 0% 20 20 19.88 23.02 25.81
POS6-0.BR3.LAX9.ALTER.NET 0% 20 20 19.50 22.29 27.11
at-3-0-0.br1.lax1.gblx.net 0% 20 20 23.61 27.64 33.39
pos6-0-2488M.cr1.LAX1.gblx.net 0% 20 20 22.62 26.25 31.34
pos1-0-2488M.cr2.JFK1.gblx.net 0% 20 20 99.17 101.72 104.55
so3-0-0-2488M.ar1.JFK1.gblx.net 0% 20 20 96.87 100.49 105.78
Net-Access-Corporation-Net-Access-Corp.so-0-2-1.ar1.JFK1.gblx.net 0% 20 20 98.69 101.72 107.42
5.ge-0-0-0.gbr2.nwr.nac.net 0% 20 20 97.53 100.39 103.61
0.so-0-3-0.gbr1.oct.nac.net 0% 20 20 98.30 101.89 110.44
0095.gi-1-1.msfc1.oct.nac.net 0% 20 20 99.90 102.47 108.76
www.dslreports.com 5% 19 20 98.17 101.33 103.70 |
|
