Re: Nice in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8052374 en Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:01 EDT Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:15:01 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053170 TheChosenOne2 : The ACLU is the biggest bunch of liberal ass clowns I've ever seen in my life. They might as well change their name to Left-Wing Democrats in Disguise. Any group that argues that a recall election isn't "democratic" obviously doesn't have the people in mind, just their own agenda. And I can't think of anything MORE democratic than recalling a stupid piece of trash who'd done nothing but raise taxes, increase spending and lead a state that had a 10 billion dollar surplus to have a 30 billion dollar deficit!!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053170 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:30:50 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053133 TheChosenOne2 : At least those judges out in California can pass ONE thing that actually makes sense!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8053133 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:27:54 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052677 borborpa :
said by NOVA_Guy See Profile:
said by lesopp See Profile:
This is a good idea, at least until the ACLU takes it to the three judge panel and claims it is a freedom of speech issue.


The courts have ruled a number of times that there are different "classes" of speech when it comes to free speech. Commercial speech (which spamming would fall under, IMO) receives substantially less freedom than any statements that you or I would make. At least that's what one of my lawyer-friends told me a while ago when we discussed the whole anti-spamming-laws issue...
That is true. If freedom of speech applied, Kia could say "our cars are faster and better than BMW's, and they have HUGE engines!"...even though it's not true. Under current laws though, that is not allowed.
--
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.[AIM - BoyBandsMakeUGay]]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052677 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:36:38 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052374 NOVA_Guy :
said by lesopp See Profile:
This is a good idea, at least until the ACLU takes it to the three judge panel and claims it is a freedom of speech issue.


The courts have ruled a number of times that there are different "classes" of speech when it comes to free speech. Commercial speech (which spamming would fall under, IMO) receives substantially less freedom than any statements that you or I would make. At least that's what one of my lawyer-friends told me a while ago when we discussed the whole anti-spamming-laws issue...
--
Cox cable: the hallmark questionable business practices and lousy cable service!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052374 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:01:03 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052010 Plldwnyrpnts : When I see John Spammer and the company he was spamming for in court, losing all they worked so hard for, I'll buy it. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8052010 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:14:05 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051851 Mythicman : Actually, all I've read so far the ACLU supports most of the anti-spam laws which have been enacted. There is a line, but since the end-user foots the bill for spam, the ACLU seems to understand that it's not really a free speech issue.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051851 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:51:53 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051611 lesopp : This is a good idea, at least until the ACLU takes it to the three judge panel and claims it is a freedom of speech issue.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051611 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:22:11 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051536 maartena : The nice thing about spam is that spam sells a product that is available to me in California. So if an AMERICAN based company selling Penis Enlargement Pills (LOL) and they use some obscure Thai spamming service, they can still go after the company selling the pills.
--
»www.deanforamerica.com - You have the power to make a change! Support Howard Dean 2004]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051536 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:12:19 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051306 bistro777 : If the crime is committed in California, i.e. the recipients of spam are domiciled there, California courts hold jurisdiction. Same as if you'd struck a pedestrian in with a car registered in another state or committed mail or wire fraud in California without ever having crossed the state line.

The problem lies in forcing someone to appear in California court, especially spammers from overseas. Extradition is not an option, probably even in the US for this civil offense, so they would then have to refile in the jurisdiction where the spammer has seizable assets.

I think. :-)

Veni, Vedi, Napi. I came, I saw, I took a nap.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051306 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:30:19 EDT Re: Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051283 technick : correct.. im going to route my email through a server in california]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051283 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:28:06 EDT Nice http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051249 MrJames :
quote:
The bill, which would become law Jan. 1, allows the state attorney general to target spam operations anywhere in the United States and offshore.


If they can go after anyone in the US would we need any other state to pass a similar bill? As long as spam is being received by anyone in California they would be subject to the fines, correct?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8051249 Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:23:34 EDT