<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8108304</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8109378</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  CanOpener4 <A HREF="/useremail/u/830595"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Trouble is, it may be easier for them to "roll over" and just pay the taxes; they still may be a better price than the telcos.  And being taxed adds instant legitimacy to VOIP services.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8109378</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 21:40:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8108304</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Whistle Dixie:</SMALL><HR>Do they know about Skype?  www.skype.com <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>yawn. loaded with spyware and requires the other party to have the program as well. not as elegant as real voip. is there a skypeLITE yet?<br><small>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8108304</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:51:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8108055</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Do they know about Skype?  www.skype.com]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8108055</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:20:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  CanOpener4 <A HREF="/useremail/u/830595"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I think it's a court battle for now, but once States/Congress passes a law(s) treating VOIP as a service like telephone service the battle will be lost.<br><br>   This will really impact businesses who use VOIP over their IP networks to cut costs methinks.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106496</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:20:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/830595"><b>CanOpener4</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  KrK <A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>In my opinion, VOIP is just like any other kind of internet packets.   It's really no different from say, sending a file via the net, etc.  It's just used as a transport for voice communications that is set up to resemble telephone service for ease of use.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Exactly! Taxing VoIP appears to be very fightable in court, does it not? The question is, will they?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106444</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:14:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Opening Pandora&#x27;s box</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106196</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : In my opinion, VOIP is just like any other kind of internet packets.   It's really no different from say, sending a file via the net, etc.  It's just used as a transport for voice communications that is set up to resemble telephone service for ease of use.<br><br>It should *not* be taxed.  It should *not* be treated as "long distance" and charged more.<br><br>...but therein lies the rub.   States and the Federal Government love the taxes and fees and social programs they tack onto telephone service.   They are worried that everyone will switch to VOIP and dump POTS and they will lose their cash cow...<br><br>.... So, their answer is to treat VOIP the same as POTS and preserve their cash cow.<br><br>  They aren't the same... but one thing is.  TAXES.<br><small>--<br>"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8106196</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:41:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
