republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


PetePuma
How many lumps do you want
Premium,MVM
join:2002-06-13
Arlington, VA

reply to pnh102

Re: Cable has NO EXSCUSE TO CRY!!!

said by pnh102:
If you want to pay more per month for cable that's fine. I'd prefer not to, and I certainly think a USF charge for cable is outrageous... this is for glorified TV service, why should people be getting that as a freebie?!

As for the ruling, I am not worried at all, this is the 9th Circus Court of Appeals after all... so the ruling will be overturned in due course.

1. The 9th circuit gets overturned at almost exactly the same rate as the rest of the federal appeals courts (about 75%)

2. Why would your cost go UP? Competition will bring the price DOWN. If DSL was regulated as Cable, you think Verizon would be charging only $39.95 if nobody else could offer it to you?


oliphant5
Got Identity?
Premium
join:2003-05-24
Corona, CA

said by PetePuma:
1. The 9th circuit gets overturned at almost exactly the same rate as the rest of the federal appeals courts (about 75%)
That's true unless you look at unanimous reversals by the high court...in this catagory, the 9th Circus is unsurpassed.
--
-- Munis Killed the Telco Star -- Powered by Barry McKockenner Racing in association with Jack Mikkokov Motorsports


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

said by oliphant5:
That's true unless you look at unanimous reversals by the high court...in this catagory, the 9th Circus is unsurpassed.
Maybe they are proud to be #1?
--
The tobacco industry is more respectable than the telemarketing industry.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

reply to PetePuma

said by PetePuma:
2. Why would your cost go UP? Competition will bring the price DOWN. If DSL was regulated as Cable, you think Verizon would be charging only $39.95 if nobody else could offer it to you?
My cable bill is about $65 a month (I have expanded basic service from Comcast, and I am paying the $19.95 a month for cable modem service promotional rate). On this bill is about $3 in taxes and franchise fees. If this ruling stands, I am going to see a 9.1% tax, USF fees, and other BS charges get tacked onto my cable bill. That's how its gonna go up.

As for Verizon charging $whatever price, it doesn't matter because in my previous residence, I could not get DSL, and in my current one, I didn't bother to check, but its probably not available here either. Even if it was, I would still be wasting cash on a landline I will never use.

If other big-name ISPs want to compete with the cable company, they can make the investments and run their own wires and compete all they like. The fact that these ISPs don't want to spend this cash to do it doesn't mean that I should subsidize their lousy business model (sound familiar, folks?) with an increased hit on my cable bill.
--
The tobacco industry is more respectable than the telemarketing industry.

Monday, 04-Jun 19:19:14 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics