Transmaster Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY
I sure hope this will work. But there is still the problem with stuffing an RF signal down a unshielded line. In this case a 5 ghz carrier will be even harder to go any distance. I can also see a problem with powerline workers getting nuked nad's. and having children born with a third eye -- I love Irish Terriers, Low Brass, and the electric blue glow of an 866 mercury vapor rectifier tube at night. [text was edited by author 2003-10-17 20:46:05]
Forgot to mention on BPL in Iraq that Saddam's son was also quite impressed by the demo where he could do with this kind of bandwidth 4D porn and fully rot what was left of his mind.
I though I saw a while back here or another teck site that the military was angry about the curent WiFi could cause problems on their use of that frequence spectrium. If so add BPL to this and it will will be crushed quickly.
The whole problem is the same as a sparkgap transmitter. It just two wide in spectrium it takes up. There are no hugh unused gaps in the spectrium that is wide enough or would help in the leakage problem. That is why SG were band earler last century. The UHF and higher frequence are in heavy uses. The only real spectrium is in the spectrium just below and through light.
If the power compant would run fiber on their rightaway they would be much better off. Both cable and even phone use the same poles in areas.
If the people wanting BPL think the power companies will, as a kind jesture, run this out to the boonies for next to nothing better take that breath right now.
Funny you should mention it but here is a photo I recently obtained of Uday just after he finished watching 100 straight hours of 4D porno without any sleep. Baghdad bagels with goat cheese and German beer do wonders for a man. -- I love Irish Terriers, Low Brass, and the electric blue glow of an 866 mercury vapor rectifier tube at night.
