| Big typo "A blistering 216 Mbps, with latency of less than 500 milliseconds"
500 milliseconds is .5 seconds, about the same as a satellite link, very bad.
According to Corridor Systems it should be 500 microseconds, very good latency. 
»www.corridor.biz/0309-corridor-pr.pdf |
|
 UnKownThe Underground Network
join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL | very true, but to Large businesses that dont play games the extra latencity is no problem compared to the speed. |
|
| I don't think so. Try VOIP or Video conferencing over a high latency link. Not fun. |
|
 calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA | Re: Bigger typo Aw, 'cmon. What's the difference if you're off by a factor of 1,000?
(Best recent gaffe: the FCC, in its recent screed on telephone unbundling, mis-defined "DS-1" as a 1.544 MegaBYTE signal instead of 1.544 MegaBIT signal--and repeated the error for DS-3. When they issued a controversial "Errata" changing several other things in the Order, they missed these two....)
Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
|
|
| reply to Automate
Re: Big typo Sheech! 500 milliseconds? Thats as bad as CDPD modem! Pritty bad! |
|
