site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
480
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:70
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice

The other dumb question

Note: this is not a bell shill post or anything just a general question

Would they have to play by the same rules the business does already?? Ya know share lines and such.. I would imagine with any communications business(and yes police department radio towers have to still obey the FCC) still have to obey the FCC guidelines in regards to competition?? I would think just because a local goverment provides the service they have to...
--
Fast and furious!! 225lbs lost and a future that I never dreamed of... Whodathunkit??


woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA

Then they could screw whom they gave access to............hmmm



David
Now accepting new patients
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:70
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
·Google Voice

said by woody7:
Then they could screw whom they gave access to............hmmm
Keep in mind and I have spoke to a few covad techs, they are still allowed in C.O.'s and in thier cages. Just like ASI is. Trust me I talked briefly (about the time I was hired at SBC) to a covad tech and he was in the C.O. before ASI became seperate on the day in may..
--
Fast and furious!! 225lbs lost and a future that I never dreamed of... Whodathunkit??

SanJoseNerd
Premium
join:2002-07-24
San Jose, CA

reply to David

said by David:
Would they have to play by the same rules the business does already?? Ya know share lines and such.. I would imagine with any communications business(and yes police department radio towers have to still obey the FCC) still have to obey the FCC guidelines in regards to competition?? I would think just because a local goverment provides the service they have to...
Right now, telcos mostly have to share lines, while cablecos mostly don't have to share lines.

I would expect muni operations would have to obey the rules for cablecos. In terms of network architecture and the types of services offered, a muni operation is likely to be more similar to a cableco than a telco. Legally, a muni operation is very much like a cableco. A cableco operates under a franchise agreement with the local government, and therefore a cableco is, in a sense, a creation of the local government. A muni operation is also a creation of the local government, just with a different ownership structure.

As a practical matter, I think muni operations are much more likely to permit sharing than any of the cablecos. A muni operator doesn't own any television channels, production companies, music labels, and such; and therefore it has no economic incentive to steer customers to its own offerings and block out others.

Monday, 04-Jun 19:34:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics