Re: Well Duh in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8380437 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:59:55 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:59:55 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386254 login name : Compared to many states, yes Massholes have high incomes "on average". You are right however about the job market being saturated up here.

(btw, I think you are my closest "dslr neighbor")
--
Click Me I'm Deviant!|Click Me I'm Live!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386254 Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:20:39 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386158 Phoenix__1 :
said by Angrychair See Profile:
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation.


Massachusetts, high incomes?!? SLMAO (Sadly laughs my a** off)

To many people willing to work + lots of people in the same jobs, goods, & service as the next guy = less demand in any given spot = less workers needed & less income.
--
My friends theory about the after life or the lack of it. Once you die, god uses your soul for food. The devil is just someone or something who's been trying to tap the line & as such, also use your soul for food.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386158 Sat, 01 Nov 2003 14:09:04 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386003 login name : Actually, I have. I have lived in Narragansett, and went to URI. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8386003 Sat, 01 Nov 2003 13:45:33 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8385973 Harddrive : You've never been to 'southern' RI or 'western' RI. Very rural. I will admit it does take longer to drive across the Dallas/Ft Worth Metroplex than RI.
--
Fortunately I keep my feathers numbered, for just such an emergency.-Foghorn Leghorn]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8385973 Sat, 01 Nov 2003 13:40:44 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8383701 Nikita : I though California was the most populated state in the US? Or is Jersey by square miles the most populated state?

w00t cable, sorry I just had to be happy for cable. Wouldn't trade it for anything but fiber :)
--
Penguins have an organ above their eyes that converts seawater to fresh water]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8383701 Sat, 01 Nov 2003 03:54:01 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382381 slavik4 : All that is available to me in NYC is crap cable (about 600/130) and DSL ...

And this is NYC??? I want my OOL, please! (in an area not serviced by time-warner/cablevision :-\ but rather "NuVisions" :O)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382381 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:06:24 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382207 mig288 :
said by CharlieN See Profile:
said by amenite See Profile:
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile

From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.


New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles.


And I still am only stuck with Comcrap, and DSL. Give me Fiber!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382207 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:41:27 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382054 login name : I believe that is the population per square mile he listed.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8382054 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:18:21 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8381808 Eat Me :
quote:
Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities


New York City, yes. New York State, no. I believe that most of New York state is farmland and wilderness.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8381808 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:45:34 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8381779 CharlieN :
said by amenite See Profile:
NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile

From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.


New Jersey's land area is 7419 sq miles. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8381779 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:41:17 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380986 login name : damn, they do pack em in down in the garden state.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380986 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:00:52 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380969 amenite : NJ: 1,134.4/sq. mile
RI: 863.5/sq. mile

From 2000 census data.
NJ has over 8 million people.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380969 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:58:51 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380940 fuzydice : i live in Ca in the SF Bay Area and i dont have fiber :( i cant even get dsl :( :( stuck with 'comcast-the-monopoly' :( :( :( :( :( guess its better than nothing (when it works)
--
[referring to the RIAA...] These guys buy congress people like M&Ms]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380940 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:54:56 EDT Re: Well Duh part II http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380517 Wholigan : Sure, these states have the highest incomes, big deal. They also have the highest cost of living as well.

What I fail to find in this article anything regarding the costs to provide broadband to rural areas. The states with the high population densities pretty much are already wired to provide broadband services while poor rural areas are not. It is simply not profitable to provide broadband services with the technology we have now. With the exception of satellite BB.

Maybe they can tell us something we don't already know.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380517 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:01:56 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380437 login name : I thought Rhode Island was the most densly populated..the state is only 30x40 miles yet has over a million people in it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380437 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:51:46 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380407 Dreadwing6 : And yet nyc does not have fibre like california :\]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380407 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:47:49 EDT Re: Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380373 Stewy85 : Well that sucks for me....there are more cows where I live than people.

But at least I still have broadband. (costs and arm and a leg though)
[text was edited by author 2003-10-31 18:43:37]
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380373 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:42:51 EDT Well Duh http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380271 Angrychair : Not only do those states have the highest incomes, but they ALSO have some of the highest population densities, with NJ being the most densely populated state in the nation.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8380271 Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:29:29 EDT