<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Tweak and a question. in Broadband Tweaks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8713426</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:54:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:54:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: My speed is sad.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8723305</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/675365"><b>Bubba</b></A> : Perhaps if you would become pingable the Tweak Tester could be a more accurate representation.<br><br>It's part of step one <I>in case</I> you over looked it.<br><br>&#8226; <I>1. A Tweaks test from this page. Simply post the tests URL. <B>Please make yourself pingable</B></I><br><br><I><U>Notes and recommendations:</U><br> <B>Become pingable</B><br>if you need basic packet loss tests done<br> Check tweak FAQ</I><br> <br><SMALL>--<br>"I R 1"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8723305</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>My speed is sad.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8721194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="/speedtests/2889856;56761;d9956cde187ce811fe34172869748873;2.0;sea.speakeasy.net/1070856911/1">/speedtests/28&middot;&middot;&middot;70856911</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/block:32136d4?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal" >ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL><br><br>2889 / 56<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/8721194?c=484314&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3I4NzEzNDI2LnhtbA%3D%3D"><IMG TITLE="25658 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=384 HEIGHT=269 SRC="/r0/download/484314~94eb448c1e604bc71dc28910d967da5c/Drtcp.JPG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8721194</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 23:18:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8720371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : No. I'm not mocking Jazzman....<br><br>Using his tweak and taking the tweak test I kept seeing retransmissions and sacks sent.  <br><br>I'm using this now. (See the Jpeg)<br>No retranmissions or sacks sent. It has something to do with the window scaling and time stamping I'm sure. Since when I set those and used Jazzman's tweak the tweak test was fine.<br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL><br><br>Edit. Oops. My mtu is off. I'll fix that right now.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/8720371?c=484241&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3I4NzEzNDI2LnhtbA%3D%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="32145 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=375 SRC="/r0/download/484241.thumb600~94eb448c1e604bc71dc28910d967da5c/Drtcp.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8720371</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8720171</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/675365"><b>Bubba</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Ol_OO_ll_Ol <A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>What's your opinion. Is the tweak test more important, so use my tweak. Or does speed rule, and use Jazzman's tweak ?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>My opinion is that your approach is boarding on not neccesarily questioning the ability of  jazzman916 <A HREF="/useremail/u/465822"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> but attempting in a rather sarcastic way thumbing your nose at someone in the Tweak Forum that devotes many hours in assisting folks like yourself. <br><br>I read the part about...."This is just a fun question and isn't to serious"....so don't take my post wrong either. This is just a personal comment from someone who has always appreciated the work this Forum has dished out over the years I have been here. Hopefully  jazzman916 <A HREF="/useremail/u/465822"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> will drop by and <I>maybe</I> he'll see a need to offer his comments of why he felt you would be better served with an RWIN of 64240<br><SMALL>--<br>"I R 1"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8720171</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:35:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8714089</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/532035"><b>garp123</b></A> : Scaling doesn't do anything with RWIN below 65536.<br><br>Timestamps are usually beneficial with very a large RWIN or very high latency.<br><br>Im with GeekNJ on this one. Use the lowest RWIN that alllows your speed.<br><SMALL>--<br>Free the <A HREF="http://www.wm3.org">West Memphis Three</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8714089</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:29:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/737632"><b>sargeeld</b></A> : The time stamping off is probably what fixed it and not the Windows scaling.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713513</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:44:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713469</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : I left window scaling on. And time stamping off. It fixed what was wrong with Jazzman's tweak. Would never have thought of that tweak.<br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/8713469?c=483756&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3I4NzEzNDI2LnhtbA%3D%3D"><IMG TITLE="25527 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=387 HEIGHT=272 SRC="/r0/download/483756~94eb448c1e604bc71dc28910d967da5c/Drtcp.JPG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713469</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:23:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713456</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : Here's Jazz' tweak. Looks fine. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/block:239a4ca?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal" >ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><br>I hear you GeekNJ. I'll use my tweak. <br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713456</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/206593"><b>GeekNJ</b></A> : Like I said, make it any number you want. Double what you have. <br><br>If there's no issues between you and the server it won't matter how high you make your RWIN.<br><SMALL>--<br>Have you <A HREF="http://www.levinecentral.com/optimize-ool.html">tweaked your OOL connection</A>?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713448</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:11:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : Just did another tweak test with my rwin, not Jazzman's. And the tweak test was right on. No re-transmissions or sacks sent. Look.:)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/block:4efbaa3?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal" >ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL><br><br>Edit. Now I'll try Jazzman''s tweak again. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713444</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:10:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/206593"><b>GeekNJ</b></A> : I'd suggest using the lowest RWIN that gives you the most consistent speeds. You could up your RWIN to 999999 and you might see a speed improvement but if there's any retransmissions or packet loss anywhere between you and the machine you're communicating with, the 999999 will slow you down.<br><SMALL>--<br>Have you <A HREF="http://www.levinecentral.com/optimize-ool.html">tweaked your OOL connection</A>?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713439</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 07:04:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Tweak and a question.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713426</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/903290"><b>Ol_OO_ll_Ol</b></A> : I tweaked myself and used Jazzman's tweak to see which one was better. So which one should I use. The larger rwin always has a better tweak test, no re-transmissions.<br>Jazzman's rwin tweak of 64240 always has tweak test re-transmissions. But Jazzman's tweak is much faster on a speed test to the same site.<br><br>What's your opinion. Is the tweak test more important, so use my tweak. Or does speed rule, and use Jazzman's tweak ?<br><br>Here's my results. This is just a fun question and isn't to serious.:) What's your opinion ?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/block:a1eba5?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal" >ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><br>Seattle 4352 / 452<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/speedtests/4352546;452830;20f729018ec5e3b3bb5d867f5a804e19;2.0;sea.speakeasy.net/1070797670/1">/speedtests/43&middot;&middot;&middot;70797670</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/block:37492df?service=cable&speed=3000&os=winXP&via=normal" >ny-monitor.dslreports.com/tweak/&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><br>Seattle 4856 / 484<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/speedtests/4856694;484222;dcdd54ae60aa6e8a374c759e0f38cf55;2.0;sea.speakeasy.net/1070797910/1">/speedtests/48&middot;&middot;&middot;70797910</A><br><SMALL>--<br>b11ng00 ++</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8713426</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 06:57:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
