site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
6096
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Forum FAQ ·Forum Guidelines ·ActionTec ·Alcatel ·Proxim/Orinoco ·Xincom
page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies


nelsong

join:2001-11-03
Lafayette, LA

reply to vip007

Re: Uniden ENR-1504 router?

Just FYI - I saw this on another thread, and confirm that it works. As it comes out of the box, this router responds to pings and lists almost all ports as closed.

The first page of this thread shows how to disable ping.

What I came across is that if you enable the DMZ and point it to a non assigned ip address on your network, then all ports show up as stealthed.

Put that together with the disabled ping, and you get a perfect rating at shieldsup.


anony2004

@comcast.net

hot dog! After not succeeding in getting DHCP address from ISP by RENEW button, I tried adding bogus IP LAN address in the DMZ setting and applied the change, DHCP worked.



anony2004

@comcast.net

darn. It lost the assigned IP address after 8 hours of use. Into storage it goes...



Bobb5
Premium
join:2001-02-16
Kent, WA

said by anony2004:
darn. It lost the assigned IP address after 8 hours of use. Into storage it goes...

I tried what you did, and it worked! To bad to hear it stops working. I can't get this thing to stealth the ports! 3 ports show up stealth, all others closed.
--
Vote out the embarrassment! - Kerry 2004»www.johnkerry.com/


Baloo1
Premium
join:2003-09-27
Maryland

Bobb, try it this way to get stealth...

Advanced Configuration> DMZ
Enable DMZ
Enter an IP that is not in your lan. Mine already had 198.162.1.254 entered.
Apply and reboot

This stealthed everything for me. All unsolicited packets are routed to the non-existant IP and dropped. I am new to routers so I don't know if this is the best thing to do. Nothing incoming is logged using this method.

Could someone tell me if I should use this DMZ method and get stealth or leave the config the way it came out of the box showing ports closed (and have logs). Either way nothing got through to my software firewall.


Ryan_C

join:2004-02-21
Phoenix, AZ

Stealth is the way to go. Sending a Closed response tells the other comp that its scanner has stumbled upon a valid IP address with a working comp. Not good.



Baloo1
Premium
join:2003-09-27
Maryland

Thanks for the response. I understand what you're saying. I'm going to leave it in the stealth config. Everything is working fine. This has been a good piece of equipment for me so far.



Bobb5
Premium
join:2001-02-16
Kent, WA

said by Baloo1:
Thanks for the response. I understand what you're saying. I'm going to leave it in the stealth config. Everything is working fine. This has been a good piece of equipment for me so far.

When you tried the DMZ trick, did that hold?
One post was saying after 8 hours it changed.
I emailed Uniden, complained that my prior routers have been secure out of the box and this is awkward to setup, etc. I got a automated response with a Question Reference # & Status: Unresolved. So far no more E-mails. Hopefully they will fix this, new firmware, whatever!
--
Vote out the embarrassment! - Kerry 2004»www.johnkerry.com/


Baloo1
Premium
join:2003-09-27
Maryland

My router's held my settings since they were put in. I just ran shieldsup again to make sure before posting and all is stealth.

I did a lot of searching to learn about routers since getting this and I found a couple of sites with info about setting up the DMZ to get stealth. Both were about Linksys routers not stealthing out of the box. (This could be different now, I don't know how old these write-ups are, but they helped me set this one up.)

»www.2kevin.net/router.html#SETUP
»www.practicallynetworked.com/sup···#stealth

This has been a really good router for me since I got things all set up. I didn't really expect it for the price.

I'm running the 1.02 firmware that shipped.



Bobb5
Premium
join:2001-02-16
Kent, WA

Thanks! good info. Yeah all n all it's a good router & well worth the price of free A/R + Ship. I'm not even that worried about the stealth thing since I do have a soft Firewall. But I do want things right and all stealth. I upgraded firmware to 1.08, no big changes. I'll try the DMZ trick again, I tried it and it did work, just someone in this thread or another said it didn't hold so I put it back to default. Anyway, thanks for the info & links..
--
Vote out the embarrassment! - Kerry 2004»www.johnkerry.com/



Bobb5
Premium
join:2001-02-16
Kent, WA

reply to vip007
No problem with BBR port scan anymore, passed!
GRC pass to except ping reply, shows all stealth though!

GRC Shields up:
Solicited TCP Packets: PASSED
Unsolicited Packets: PASSED
Ping Reply: RECEIVED (FAILED)
--
Vote out the embarrassment! - Kerry 2004»www.johnkerry.com/



jpperrein

@net81-66-80.noos.fr

reply to nonayourbizn

Re: Uniden ENR-1504 router? Comments...

If you had resolve this, i'm interested
tks

animecabbit

join:2004-03-07
Philadelphia, PA

reply to vip007

Re: Uniden ENR-1504 router?

OK, I tried to load the RP614v2 firmware and, of course, it did not work (complained about wrong firmware.) I don't have time to play with it now but will do it next week---does anyone know how they register firmware to a specific manufacturer (some kind of ID string in the firmware file?)

Have you tried dropping to command line and using switches to force the firmware to write without confirm/complain? You can do a "/?" to see what switches it accepts.

jeje0

join:2004-01-04
Huntsville, AL

reply to daifanshi

said by daifanshi:

One neat thing is that the router is likely running embedded Linux since the development tools for the KS8695 include a Linux kernel.

The ENR-1504 router is NOT running a Linux based firmware. As far as I can tell, it is using Nucleus RTOS from Accelerated Technology Inc.

Here is the copyright string and version found in the WNR2004_1.08.bin firmware:
1993-2001 ATI - Nucleus PLUS
ARM 6/7/9 1.13.20

But, yes, Linux should run fine on this piece of hardware...

Jerome

jeje0

join:2004-01-04
Huntsville, AL

reply to animecabbit

said by animecabbit:
Have you tried dropping to command line and using switches to force the firmware to write without confirm/complain? You can do a "/?" to see what switches it accepts.

How do you drop to command line? Are you able to get a shell through telnet? Or, did you connect a serial terminal to the internal UART connector (with a level shifter?)?

Please, clarify.

Thanks,

Jerome

thosek

join:2004-03-18
Raleigh, NC

reply to vip007

Forward an Ext. Port to a Different Int. Port

Hello,

I need to forward an External Port to a Different Internal
Port.

Example: 25.185.50.55:9000 to 192.168.1.200:80

I own a Uniden ENR1504 router, I tried accomplishing this
by using Packet Filtering without any success.

The reason I need to do this is because my ISP blocks port
80 & I have a PowerEdge 1600SC with a DRAC III/XT card
that is hard coded to port 80.

Has anybody accomplished this on this router?

Any Help or Information would be Greatly Appreciated!

Thanks,
RR

toowired8

join:2004-09-06
Chesapeake, VA

reply to vip007

Re: Uniden ENR-1504 router?

I have to fire this discussion up again...the 1504 firmware has been stale for a while now. Anyone successful getting the RP614 v2 working on this? Or tried any other DR-E604 flavor? How about Nucleus RTOS revamp?

Just curious...I have the latest 2k3 version from uniden, and am thinking of trashing it from lack of features. Unless someone dinked around with it enough to run something cool.

I've tried...gave up. Even someone with leads on an embedded linux...

TIA

Monday, 04-Jun 14:38:45 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics