<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8876379</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:14:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:14:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/313042"><b>BrushedTooth</b></A> : If you haven't looked at GSM providers coverage lately you should look again, it is catching up with CDMA very fast, and possibly might match or beat it in 2004.<br><SMALL>--<br>"I am just like a clock upon the wall, always moving but never really going anywhere"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876379</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:17:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876082</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : the functions work like they should. Except the camera, but this isn't designed to be a camera phone.<br>It is expensive, that is true.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876082</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:46:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/376682"><b>JJV</b></A> : I missed the Sprint part.<br>GSM hasnt been built out well by any US provider.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8876077</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:45:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875929</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/620320"><b>Ralphie</b></A> : I think I will wait for the Treo 700 if their will be a 700, because the Treo 600 costs more than it is worth.  It might look cool, but if the functions don't work like they should, then I won't waist my money.<br><SMALL>--<br>When all else fails, get out the BFH</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875929</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875883</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : Define real?<br>The GSM version works on t-mobile, which has decent metro coverage.<br>The Sprint version, black, but otherwise identical, works on their network, which is national, as far as I know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875883</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:25:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>GSM  Yuck!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/376682"><b>JJV</b></A> : Cool phone! <br>Too bad there isnt a real network for it in the USA.<br><br>:(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8875813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:17:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
