<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: 5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r8929335</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:31:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:31:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929445</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/348012"><b>cmaenginsb</b></A> : Not only was a lot invested in fiber, but many of the power carriers have pulled fiber along their rights of way, so using BPL as a delivery solution with wireless last mile as the article mentions is kind of a joke when they have infinitely more bandwidth using the fiber they have already pulled.<br><SMALL>--<br>CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929445</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:16:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929335</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/669632"><b>KB2PSM</b></A> : I believe that the point he is making is that so much was invested in fiber as a means of high speed digital communication, but it is seldom mentioned anymore. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929335</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:05:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929299</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/693768"><b>Eat Me</b></A> : I didn't say that BPL required fiber.  I'm saying that while 5GHz BPL is a nice idea, I think that it's just a patch, and that fiber is the real solution to the problem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8929299</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:01:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8927788</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Since when does BPL, "broadband via power-lines", need fiber?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8927788</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:21:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>5GHz == Good, but where&#x27;s the fiber?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8927523</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/693768"><b>Eat Me</b></A> : BPL at 5GHz seems to be a better solution, but where's the fiber?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8927523</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 10:49:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
