site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
28
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

N0JCG

join:2003-07-18
Minneapolis, MN

This is ridiculous !

Individuals, AMRAD, ARRL, and others have all publicly presented evidence of actual interference, both from and to BPL systems. Not one BPL proponent has presented any evidence to the contrary. When confronted, they claim ridiculous things like "that's always been there" or "you must be hearing a licensed service". I'm surprised they haven't blamed it on extra-terrestials!

His argument that the FCC would not let them proceed if there was interference is equally ridiculous. Under part 15, they can build almost anything; it is their responsibility to verify that it does not interfere, not the FCC's.

Mr Kilbourne;
SHOW US YOUR EVIDENCE!

Sunday, 03-Jun 14:47:23 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics