| reply to David95037
Re: Interference overshadows much bigger BPL problems What gets me non-linear is that many "media" are falling in the trap of the BPL industry by totally blind sighting the worse case scenario of BPL, i.e. flawed financials leading to further loss of confidence in our financial institutions.
It is not that we have not been there before and should know better by now. I notice that the Enron scam auditors are about done with the nicely hairdo-ed and fast-talking Enron execs. Perhaps they should do a preemptive strike on the BPL industry scammers and audit their financial claims of monthly $30 per subscriber for not even a real broadband throughput. What are the assumptions made, are these assumptions validated with people with real credentials?
The most interesting story on BPL has now turned to how the media covers this. I am obviously seriously affected by Kucinick and his record dealing with the pucs. I can see the same flow of Public Relations money affecting how the stories are being spinned in order to scam investors out of their greed and delusion. With all respect to the most valuable service that BBR provides, I trust the story spinners understand that the forum participants will become more critical of the BPL news coverage. I can definitely see more people getting further irritated if this coverage does not get more balanced. |
|
| Shall we play poker? Allright the interference problem can be worked out. Tell us more about your financials then. How can you provide a lighweight broadband service at $30 a month?
Any takers out there to answer this one in the media??? |
|
