For one thing nil just said that it would make a lot of extra work for her. And I don't understand why it's such a big deal in making them bigger Especially if it's going to make a whole lot of extra work for nil or anyone else who will have to do it.
said by splix:But the fact is they aren't "large", they are only 10 pixels biggger. I still don't understand why it's such a big deal.
Of course, you're making the argument in reverse as well. If it's on 10 pixels, then 40x40 should be fine since they're only 10 pixels smaller.
Something to consider: Of all the major changes made to this site in the last year (that anyone complained about), how many of them were changed back to the way they were previously?
10 pixels is a whole lot when creating an avatar. even though it may not look like much to the untrained eye, when magnified to 600%, it is a whole lot . and that is how most animated avatars are created. every pixel counts