dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
12

splix
Premium Member
join:2002-02-19
Oakton, VA

splix to sashwa

Premium Member

to sashwa

Re: Larger Avatars

But the fact is they aren't "large", they are only 10 pixels biggger. I still don't understand why it's such a big deal.

sashwa
Mod
join:2001-01-29
Alcatraz
446.4 4.0

sashwa

Mod

For one thing nil just said that it would make a lot of extra work for her. And I don't understand why it's such a big deal in making them bigger Especially if it's going to make a whole lot of extra work for nil or anyone else who will have to do it.

sash

PetePuma
How many lumps do you want
MVM
join:2002-06-13
Arlington, VA

PetePuma to splix

MVM

to splix
said by splix:
But the fact is they aren't "large", they are only 10 pixels biggger. I still don't understand why it's such a big deal.

Of course, you're making the argument in reverse as well. If it's on 10 pixels, then 40x40 should be fine since they're only 10 pixels smaller.

Something to consider: Of all the major changes made to this site in the last year (that anyone complained about), how many of them were changed back to the way they were previously?

*neutral*

Weirdal
Premium Member
join:2003-06-28
Grand Island, NE

Weirdal

Premium Member

10 pixels is a whole lot when creating an avatar.
even though it may not look like much to the untrained eye, when magnified to 600%, it is a whole lot . and that is how most animated avatars are created. every pixel counts