 VampirefoPremium,MVM
join:2000-12-11
Huntington, WV
kudos:1 | reply to Randy Bell
Re: Heuristics av-test 10-2003 by checkvir.com! Yes, with AH I have even said would bring Nod's results up among the Leaders, but AH is not tested nor should it ever be included in any test Until Nod adds it for selection.
AH is a hidden option and until Nod decides to unhide it no tester should waste time on it, Nod has it hidden for a reason.
--
Spam Officially Legal |
|
| said by Vampirefo:
Yes, with AH I have even said would bring Nod's results up among the Leaders, but AH is not tested nor should it ever be included in any test Until Nod adds it for selection.
AH is *very* promising and I agree, I don't understand why ESET doesn't more fully integrate it into the AV. 
--
"But now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love." (1 Cor. 13:13) |
|
VampirefoPremium,MVM
join:2000-12-11
Huntington, WV
kudos:1 | I think they put to much Marketing into the VB test and fear failing it due to a false detection.
--
Spam Officially Legal |
|
| reply to Vampirefo
I have seen nod32 on a lot of computers and with out doubt it is way over rated. It does scan very fast, that is because it basicaly doesn't have an unpacking engine and it's huristics are no better than kav's mcafees or any other premium antivirus.It does well in vb tests but I question their testing ethics.They will disallow a 100% vb award because of one false positive even though the av detected 100% of the malware. |
|
