republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


FLECOM
Bay Networks Freak
Premium
join:2003-03-03
Miami, FL
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

1 edit

reply to Iridium

Re: Wireless is the future...

wireless may be the future... but what links your wireless access points (be they cellular or other) will most likely be fiber

fiber will be used a lot even with wireless... fiber will be faster and have less latency than fiber for a while to come

--
BellSouth sucks


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Actually part of the benefit of Nextel's Flash OFDM is supposedly incredibly low latency. Unfortunatly they're only trialing it in North Carolina with no hint at what kind of broad deployment is coming.....

Speeds aren't near fiber, but they're better than any of their 3G competitors....

»www.insightexpress.com/ix/showSu···0734800&



Iridium
Premium
join:2003-04-02
Los Angeles, CA
Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME

1 edit

reply to FLECOM
Yeah that's true. I wonder if there are any fiber cables out here....and whats up with it costing so much to deploy the fiberoptics? i heard someone say its like $1000 a square foot to install them! Thats highway robbery. Isn't it just making a conduit on the ground and shoving the cable down there? And they can install cable tv lines easily, so why cant they do the same with fiber optics(I dont know if cable is underground or above ground). I heard in Japan they use robots to tunnel fiber through the sewer systems, are there any places in the US that are doing that? Freakin Los Angeles, so behind the times.
/me moves to San Francisco



spg
Grrrr

join:2001-10-31
NOT Texas!

fiber is expensive to place because when you place it, the pulling tension must be limited or you'll pull the fibers apart. The tensile strength is not all that high. In addition, while copper is placed typically in six or seven hundred foot sections, it is not uncommon to place a 5,000 or even 10,000 foot section.

one of the ways it's done is to literally blow it down the innerduct (a smaller conduit placed with others inside the traditional duct under the street) with air pressure.

So it takes special equipment to do this and it's not cheap. Add to that the fact that a lot of the fiber equipment has a shorter lifespan than the copper equipment because of obsolescence.

I see obstacles to placing in other utilities' pipelines such as "square corners" versus radii, etc. Also, I could envision a tangled mess in the sewers as additional fibers are placed, and just how is a camera-bot going to travel down the pipes for inspections? Abandoned pipes may work, but I don't see using active ones.

It may work, but sometimes I wonder if these are merely pie in the sky ideas or an attempt to con me out of my money.


Monday, 04-Jun 04:06:08 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics