site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


De_fine

@comcast.net

reply to SRFireside

Re: Bell Monopoly

Monopoly - A business no one wanted to invest in until that business got really big and made a lot of money.

Rip off - I build a really big business and spend a lot of money on infrastructure. Then you come along a hundred years later and expect me to "give" you what I built when no one else wanted to build it.

I live in an apartment. I want your garage. You have a 3 car garage. I don't care that you spent the last 30 years paying off the house or that you paid for the materials to build it in the first place. Gimme "my" parking spot in your garage, you parking place monopoly.


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

Nice way to over simplify the scenario. Let me repeat. The Bells AGREED to sharing their lines. In other words they worked out a deal with the U.S. government to lease their lines to competitors so they can get better deals on offering long distance services. Nobody twisted their arm. Nobody coerced them. Nobody forced them to take the deal.

The Bells didn't get their monopoly because nobody else wanted to build it. They got it because the government wanted a standardized form of communication. If you check your history you will find out there were plenty of other telcos that ended up getting absorbed by Ma Bell because of this. The Bells have been riding a gravy train and then they screwed up by getting too greedy. That's why they have to share their lines.


Monday, 04-Jun 09:41:05 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics