<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r9657894</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:46:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:46:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9683842</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/935153"><b>niko01</b></A> : "Big business" opposes it because the definition draws in potentially legitimate software that has nothing to do with spyware.  That legit software may, or may not, comply with the technical terms of this bill.  Vague bills encourage litigation.  <br><br>What you are not being told is that "big business" includes a wide array of organizations opposing this bill, including the Center for Democracy & Technology.  What you are also not being told is that this bill was bought and paid for by 1-800-Contacts, which is based in Sandy, Utah, and is the result of its ongoing battles with predatory pop-ups from competitors.<br><br>"Big business" has offered to work with the sponsors if the'd make the bill less about the technology and more about improper use of the technology...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9683842</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9661889</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Overdrive <A HREF="/useremail/u/400554"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>EULA: who really reads them... I glance through it if it is a free/shareware prog to see if it is installing spyware... but with all of the mumbo-jumbo in there I wonder if even a lawyer could disect 'em. <br><br>that is of course my opinion.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>When i see "Third party" in the install agreement the software goes into the bit bucket, not my hard drive.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9661889</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:05:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9658345</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/631970"><b>CCCMTech</b></A> : I know, so I think the EULAs will be expanded upon to include such malware and HOPEFULLY an option to opt out. Most EULAs mention spyware now if you can read through all 10,000 words.<br><SMALL>--<br>Thank you for choosing SBC Internet Services. My name is Rick. How may I help you today?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9658345</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:31:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9658201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : yeah but we're not always given the option of 'opting' out and when we are the process is sometimes painful and tedious.  There are a lot of people out there that don't know such information is being recorded and sold and the EULA agreements aren't always informative of such facts.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/seti">Help DSLR Claim 5th in SETI!!</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9658201</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:10:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657894</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/631970"><b>CCCMTech</b></A> : EULAs are like a CYOA clause, but this only prevents prosecution on the basis of "they didn't know it was going on"<br><br>If the outlaw it, it will bring up questionable suits, basically the EU agreed to install such software and had a chance to opt out, etc.<br><SMALL>--<br>Thank you for choosing SBC Internet Services. My name is Rick. How may I help you today?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657894</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:29:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/823721"><b>PhoenixDown</b></A> : I hope other states do the same!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657892</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:29:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657855</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/400554"><b>Overdrive</b></A> : EULA: who really reads them... I glance through it if it is a free/shareware prog to see if it is installing spyware... but with all of the mumbo-jumbo in there I wonder if even a lawyer could disect 'em. <br><br>that is of course my opinion.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.sanzone.net">Need a Web Developer?</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657855</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:26:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657842</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/631970"><b>CCCMTech</b></A> : I agree with the must be great if businesses hate it, for the most part anyway.<br><br>The biggest problem I see is enforcement.<br><SMALL>--<br>Thank you for choosing SBC Internet Services. My name is Rick. How may I help you today?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657842</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:23:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Support the bill if big business oppose it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : As far as i am concerned if big business hate this bill because they have to be just a little bit careful not to run afoul of it when installing call-home plugins on your PC, and that is the main reason they oppose it, then <B>the bill is great and should be supported</B>.<br><br>There are legal rules in print advertising they have to live with, they should live with legal rules online as well. I can't think of how consumers would lose if software companies have to detail to you, the user whenever they are going to change the function of YOUR pc so that it sends back MORE information, or other 3rd parties, than it did before.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,9657826</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:21:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
