usa2kBlessed MVM join:2003-01-26 Westland, MI 1 edit
1 recommendation |
usa2k
MVM
2004-Mar-17 8:17 pm
[request] A thought for I SEE PEOPLENothing so dramatic that a vote would be needed ... Just an idea ... food for thought ... if bored ... On I see people, besides random, and mods, add a third test mode for buddies. |
|
|
removed Premium Member join:2002-02-08 Houston, TX |
removed
Premium Member
2004-Mar-17 8:26 pm
Re: A thoughtSure, why not? I'm tired of seeing fatn..err..hi.
*sign* |
|
bobrkYou kids get offa my lawn Premium Member join:2000-02-02 San Jose, CA |
to usa2k
Good one. You should have a better title, though.
*sign* |
|
PacratOld and Cranky MVM join:2001-03-10 Cortland, OH 1 edit |
to usa2k
Er... uh... why? I don't see any advantage to it. All you're trying to do is check the layout. I'm not against it, but I fail to see any advantage to it. I guess if that's what floats your boat...
What I would prefer to see is a preview of at least one member with an avatar instead of two or three pages of "randomly" chosen, avatar-less members. I always use the "mod" preview because of that. |
|
usa2kBlessed MVM join:2003-01-26 Westland, MI
1 recommendation |
to bobrk
Re: A thought for I SEE PEOPLEsaid by bobrk: Good one. You should have a better title, though.
*sign*
Better |
|
Weirdal Premium Member join:2003-06-28 Grand Island, NE |
to usa2k
*sign* sometimes i like to see a non-mod with an avatar, which is rare |
|
koamPink Pecker Premium Member join:2000-08-16 East Puddle
1 recommendation |
koam
Premium Member
2004-Mar-20 12:55 pm
you'd think that the test module could select members with avatars and posting names much more frequently so that you can see those often-used elements. |
|
usa2kBlessed MVM join:2003-01-26 Westland, MI |
usa2k
MVM
2004-Mar-20 1:00 pm
said by koam: you'd think that the test module could select members with avatars and posting names much more frequently so that you can see those often-used elements.
That too! |
|
MospawMy socks don't match.
join:2001-01-08 New Braunfels, TX
1 recommendation |
to usa2k
** SIGN! **
Too many members in the database don't have avatars. |
|
davidgGood Bye My Friend MVM join:2002-06-15 00000 |
to usa2k
*sign* |
|
Hawk Premium Member join:2003-08-25 1 edit |
Hawk
Premium Member
2004-Mar-22 12:36 am
*object* set it and forget it. Good idea though. |
|
C_9084Kill The Socialists Premium Member join:2001-03-19 |
to usa2k
*sign* |
|
neutralfaith in the future Premium Member join:2001-08-04 Chattanooga, TN 1 edit |
to usa2k
*sign*, great idea. I usually end up doing the mods test because I can go through pages of members with no avatars. |
|
meeowI'm a little spacey MVM join:1999-08-20 Portland, OR |
to usa2k
*sign* |
|
drakeBack to back MVM join:2002-06-10 Bridgeport, CT |
to Mospaw
said by Mospaw: ** SIGN! **
Too many members in the database don't have avatars.
Ditto -- *Sign* |
|
Weirdal Premium Member join:2003-06-28 Grand Island, NE
1 recommendation |
to usa2k
Perhaps 3 things: Mods No avatar Avatar
and you can preview which ever one you want |
|
drewRadiant Premium Member join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA |
drew to usa2k
Premium Member
2004-Mar-22 10:04 pm
to usa2k
whatever happens, make it so we can get at least one person with an avatar on the preview section.
*sign* |
|
splix Premium Member join:2002-02-19 Oakton, VA |
to Weirdal
said by Weirdal: Perhaps 3 things: Mods No avatar Avatar
and you can preview which ever one you want
I *sign* to that. |
|
htmlartist Premium Member join:2002-11-14 Issaquah, WA |
to usa2k
*sign* |
|
Ol DrippyRIP,,, FRIEND Premium Member join:2003-10-22 Grand Island, NE |
to usa2k
I really don't see that much of an advantage for having this feature. I dont see how this could do much of an improvement or a down grade so I will stay *neutral* on this. |
|