republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


JukeBoxHero
Premium
join:2001-12-30
USA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to ropeguru

Re: Supreme Court???

said by ropeguru:
I wonder how long it will take for all the big boys, Microsoft, AOL and the like, to get this to the Supreme Court and get it rescended by paying off the judges???

Paying off the Supreme Court judges? Come now, be real!
--
See the real John Kerry.


justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7
Host:
IPv6
Business Connectiv..
Console/Handheld g..
Home/Office setup ..
Photos of Broadban..

true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed.



JukeBoxHero
Premium
join:2001-12-30
USA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by justin:
true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed.

Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;)


justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7

I agree. At last when it comes to spyware appeals.


dda
Premium
join:2003-12-29
Bolton, MA

reply to JukeBoxHero

said by JukeBoxHero:
Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;)

I think you prove the point right there; They certainly showed they were not above reproach before so why wouldn't they do it again?

I don't think it is required, though, as a Federal law would override the Utah law just as CAM-SPAM overrode other state laws regarding spam.


whizkid3
Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-21
Queens, NY
kudos:8

reply to justin
Justin, Bravo!



b_zen
Premium
join:2002-07-24
Saint Louis, MO

reply to JukeBoxHero
how bout we create a legislation here to ban any political affiliation both in the SIG and Avatars etc...

There has been quite a few fights that started because of this. I would know

Please, take notice...

ANYONE BUT BUSH in 2004!
--

Fiber Optic is the future! 3Plink.com |Voice|Video|Data|



JukeBoxHero
Premium
join:2001-12-30
USA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by b_zen:
how bout we create a legislation here to ban any political affiliation both in the SIG and Avatars etc...
..........................snip.................................

You'll have to ask the mods or fatness to remove the avs and sigs. I don't think that it will happen during a Presidential election year.:p
--
See the real John Kerry.

Monday, 04-Jun 20:02:22 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics