 justinAustralian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7
IPv6
Business Connectiv..
Console/Handheld g..
Home/Office setup ..
Photos of Broadban..
| reply to JukeBoxHero
Re: Supreme Court??? true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Comcast
| said by justin:
true, how about taking them for rides in a private jet, saving them from flying coach, and bringing them on lavish hunting trips with VIPs .. it appears they only need then to write a 21 page rebuttal to any nasty accusations this may sway them in an upcoming judgement, and case closed.
Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;) |
|
justinAustralian
join:1999-05-28
New York, NY
kudos:7 | I agree. At last when it comes to spyware appeals. |
|
|
|
ddaPremium
join:2003-12-29
Bolton, MA | reply to JukeBoxHero
said by JukeBoxHero:
Maybe I'm an idealist but I believe that the judges are above reproach. It doesn't make sense that they would take any type of gift or payment for a decision about spyware when it was the same judges who chose the last President.;)
I think you prove the point right there; They certainly showed they were not above reproach before so why wouldn't they do it again?
I don't think it is required, though, as a Federal law would override the Utah law just as CAM-SPAM overrode other state laws regarding spam. |
|
 whizkid3Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-21
Queens, NY
kudos:8 | reply to justin
Justin, Bravo! |
|
