Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FTC Won't Act on Spyware » Regulation isn't the answer
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Good, we don't need more regulation  
AuthorAll Replies

cbs228
Geeks Of The World, Unite

join:2000-09-04
Saint Louis, MO

reply to Rhobite
Re: That is a bunch of horsecrap

While it's true that users must specifically agree to a EULA with provisions that allow "ET to phone home," these provisions are very obscure and often buried in paragraphs of ridiculously long legalese.
said by The FTC:
According to the Federal Trade Commission Act and the FTC's Unfairness Policy Statement, an ad or business practice is unfair if:
    •it causes or is likely to cause substantial consumer injury which a consumer could not reasonably avoid; and•it is not outweighed by the benefit to consumers.

    •Spyware causes actual harm. Its installation could possibly result in the theft of sensitive information, such as business trade secrets, depending on what information the program reports. It also decreases system performance and can present advertisements of questionable taste (i.e. marketing adult products to minors) on unrelated websites. Furthermore, since the average consumer is not willing to read a EULA, they are unable to discern what is going on and are thus unable to avoid it. For evidence that people do not know what is going on, see DSLR's Security forum.•Does spyware benefit consumers? While it certainly does provide a source of revenue for apps that would otherwise be distributed for a fee, the potential hazards of spyware probably outweigh this advantage. In addition, spyware can remain long after its "parent" programs have been uninstalled, which means that people continue to pay for something they do not use. Users will end up "paying" much more (consider the value of the information obtained and the ad revenues from what is presented) for spyware apps than if they purchased an equivalent application.

As such, I assert that spyware companies are engaging in deceptive business practices in violation of the FTC's Unfairness Policy. Start drafting those complaints.
--
"If you stare too long into the abyss the abyss stares back at you." -Nietzsche

GENERAL FAILURE READING ©: DRIVE
(A)bort, (R)etry, (F)rivolous Lawsuits, (B)ribe Congress?
Forums » FTC Won't Act on Spyware« Good, we don't need more regulation  


Thursday, 10-Dec 04:30:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [117] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [66] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Battered Hilt Delimma [World of Warcraft]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]