| I want to expose my home network But i wanted to make a nice graphic of my network, what kind of utile i can use? I am on Windows XP, tanks you |
|
| do you have visio? visio works real well. |
|
 WiFiSpyRtfmPremium
join:2004-03-20
Everett, WA | network notepad is free! |
|
|
|
 damnPremium
join:2002-10-23
nyc | reply to loginame1
not bad, but i wish there was better pictures..  |
|
WiFiSpyRtfmPremium
join:2004-03-20
Everett, WA | yeah but atleast you dont have to pay $$$ , or use a pirated copy of visio just to make a home network diagram. |
|
| At least, it make fine graphics, thanks you Wi-Fi, and it free. |
|
 PhoenixAZGet A MacPremium
join:2004-01-04
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:1 | reply to damn
I couldnt not get that program to work. It seems it was made in 1987 or something, considering the style of the program, and no right click ability  |
|
WiFiSpyRtfmPremium
join:2004-03-20
Everett, WA | 1987? lol , what for microsoft windows for workgroups?  |
|
 stefaanEPremium
join:2002-07-10
Luxembourg
kudos:1
 ·rapidxen
| said by WiFiSpy:
1987? lol , what for microsoft windows for workgroups?
Actually. WfWG dates from 1993, roughly. In 1987 we had Windows 2.0, with 2.3 (for the 386) on the way. Apart from Microsoft, no-one was impressed, and savvy users continued to use DesqView for MS-DOS 3.2
For $1995 per node, RayNet Communications Systems would sell you RayLan, a wireless network running at an amazing 19.2kbps (under ideal conditions). A 14" colour monitor would set you back about $1000, and Compaq was pleased to offer a high-end Deskpro 386/20 with a 386/20, 6MB RAM, a 80387 math coprocessor, a second serial/parallel port card, EGA graphics, a 300MB ESDI hard disk, and a 135MB tape drive for a very reasonable $21,500.
Take care,
Stefaan
--
"Technically, Windows is an 'operating system,' which means that it supplies your computer with the basic commands that it needs to suddenly, with no warning whatsoever, stop operating." -Dave Barry |
|
PhoenixAZGet A MacPremium
join:2004-01-04
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:1 | reply to loginame1
whats a math co processor, isnt that the Northbridge chip? |
|
damnPremium
join:2002-10-23
nyc
1 edit | reply to loginame1
no, that's co-processor, back in 486 times it used to be separate chip, now it's integrated into CPU and called FPU |
|
 Rich72Premium
join:2002-11-13
Colchester, CT | reply to loginame1
Wow... I remember those.. but never saw many.
Sfrk001: Intel made 386SX and 486SX cpu's without the hardware built in for faster math processing... you had to buy an extra chip like Damn mentioned to do that... then it would offload calculations to the coprocessor.
I think they became obsolete with the 486DX chips. |
|
