Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Class Action Lawsuit Against Covad » Covad- waiting for a taker
Uniqs:
73
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Hmmm....... this again! »
« Covad Delisted?  
Yardog

join:2001-02-17
Denver, CO

Covad- waiting for a taker

Dont worry AT@T will take over Covad and will be even better. Just a matter of time.

basshive
True-Playaz

join:2001-02-26
Waterford, WI

Re: Covad- waiting for a taker

said by Yardog:
Dont worry AT@T will take over Covad and will be even better. Just a matter of time.
Yeah. Like NP right?
--
..::drum and bass cannot be stopped::..

Archvile2

join:2000-10-22
Natick, MA

Re: Covad- waiting for a taker

Actually, Verizon wanted to buy out NorthPoint, but they backed out at the last minute.

AT&T has proven to be a good ISP; just look at all those Road Runner reviews. Much better than Verizon, who sometimes can't even keep their routing straight.

VinceLee

join:2001-02-13
San Jose, CA

I agree that AT&T is very likely to buy out Rhythms' and Covad's equipment if they go belly up.

AT&T already got a whole bunch of Copper Mountain DSLAM from Northpoint fire sale and it's expected to start its DSL operation very soon. I wouldn't be surprised if AT&T grab the rest of Rhythms to expand its network.

As for COVAD, AT&T has been an active reseller of COVAD. It is positive that AT&T won't let its current DSL customers helpless if COVAD goes down.

cranialwiz

join:2000-10-03
Wayne, PA

Re: Covad- waiting for a taker

Don't count on it VinceLee. I don't know that "T" knows their hinnie from a hole in the ground yet.
I think they are waiting for the right moment for the "consumer" broadband spin-off to emerge and carry most of the debt load with it. What they have to spend on buying fire sale CLEC DSL hardware is chump change to the debt load they already carry. A small price to pay for eliminating competition in the non-business market.
If the US market wants a broadband alternative to DSL and the distance limitations in effect, either the spin-off will have to be sold (not likely), or government funding will be needed to keep them afloat. Ha ha. Told you it was get even time for Ma Bell. It's not nice to fool with Mother Nature

jipper

join:2001-01-04
Stanton, MI
I don't see AT&T buying Covad. Not when SBC has 6% of owner ship and wants more. What a better way for SBC to expand then to have a sold network used only for business accounts with the SDSL and IDSL.
Forums » Class Action Lawsuit Against CovadHmmm....... this again! »
« Covad Delisted?  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 03:28:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [57] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [47] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [33] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [30] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [21] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [3] Monday Morning Links
· [3] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Why is VoIP Better than POTS? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]