Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Digital Radio Concerns RIAA » Ridiculous
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
77
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The RIAA exposed... »
« Keeping a 50's business model in the 20th century.  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies

login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11
Ridiculous

They don't protect regular radio in anyway, so why should they bother protecting digital broadcasts.


Ender3rd

join:2001-07-15
East Granby, CT
Agreed. I wish they would just stop whining and simply lower the bloated prices of their crappy albums.

Ender


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

reply to login name
Digital radio offers "no generation loss": bit for bit fidelity of the source data. Using a tape recorder to capture music over the air is like videotaping a movie on TV: it's not going to be as good as the "official" videotape release.

Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Site5.com
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast

They aren't afraid of tape recorders. They are afraid of the direct inputs to the digital radio. XM Satellite Radio has a system you can hook to your PC. If you know where to look, you can purchase a output and go directly to your computer where you can record hours of digial quality music straight to your PC. I know some people who do this and use a music editing program to take the music they want and save it to mp3s.

Quite a nice little system I might add.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal


NickD
Premium
join:2000-11-17
Princeton Junction, NJ
clubs:
reply to login name
All radios which have a headphone jack can be used to record music on the computer. Digital radio would allow people to record radio static-free.
--
Crunch for Team Starfire!
Pepsi GOOD/Coke BAD


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

reply to Nightfall
said by Nightfall See Profile:
They aren't afraid of tape recorders.
Isn't that what I said?
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site


anon_brian

@64.139.x.x

reply to Steve
No, quality has nothing to do with it from a legal point of view. The law is the law. Whether I record a snowy picture of Hollywood Squares on a 2 head VCR, or record the Sopranos from an HDTV feed directly to a DVD, the law is the same and it's my right to do so. The same applies to music.

I admit that newer technology makes pirating an increased threat. But too bad. I enjoy recording internet radio so I can use it on my PDA while offline. I enjoy Tivo because it lets me watch content at another time.

Frankly, introducing copy protection measures into a digital stream of music should be ruled as illegal.

I'm really sick of the RIAA. Their lawsuits are extortion and now they're trying to regulate things beyond their control.


deadmeat
Premium
join:2003-03-21
Sonoma, CA
reply to Steve
They were 20 years ago remember tape recorders were going to ruin the industry.... Cause the music execs to go on welfare.
--
" That's it Man, Game Over Man, Game Over."


Captain_Avat

join:2001-09-06
Harpers Ferry, WV

"They were 20 years ago remember tape recorders were going to ruin the industry.... "

Try 35 years ago! I remember back in the 70's that the recording industry would strong-arm FM stations into not playing whole album sides to prevent people from taping their broadcast. Rumor had it that they pushed the whole talking over the intro and song endings too to foil any "bootleggers".(But I think that started back in the 50's). Back then FM, especially FM stereo was a real boon to music broadcasts. That along with ever improving recording technology more than made up for some of the loss in quality when taping. Not to mention while the audio quality of the music was pretty good most people had cheap tape players that masked most of the defects.

login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11
reply to Steve


So, the way you put it, the RIAA doesn't care about "pirating" or "copying" lower quality music, but they care about "pirating" or "copying" high quality music.

Um...

login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11

reply to anon_brian
said by anon_brian:
No, quality has nothing to do with it from a legal point of view. The law is the law. Whether I record a snowy picture of Hollywood Squares on a 2 head VCR, or record the Sopranos from an HDTV feed directly to a DVD, the law is the same and it's my right to do so. The same applies to music.

I admit that newer technology makes pirating an increased threat. But too bad. I enjoy recording internet radio so I can use it on my PDA while offline. I enjoy Tivo because it lets me watch content at another time.

Frankly, introducing copy protection measures into a digital stream of music should be ruled as illegal.

I'm really sick of the RIAA. Their lawsuits are extortion and now they're trying to regulate things beyond their control.

Exactly.
--
"So, computers? I hear they basically break down to a bunch of ones and zeroes. I don't know how that means I can see naked womenon my screen, but God bless you people."


Augustus III
If Only Rome Could See Us Now....

join:2001-01-25
Gainesville, GA

reply to login name
So what exactly is the issue here? Most radio stations are totally useless and play the same songs for months 10 times a day.

I would be more concerned about people memorizing the music from overplay than I would be about digital radio which is just as evil as digital cable and *gasp* hdtv. incredible..


LordMalak

join:2003-07-02
Brazil
reply to login name
The RIAA never cared about analog copying due to generation loss. Copying digital content (CD-R, digital radio, MP3, etc.) bothers them because it's a perfect, bit-by-bit copy of the original.
--
SBC DSL Tech Support.


LordMalak

join:2003-07-02
Brazil

reply to Captain_Avat
said by Captain_Avat See Profile:
"They were 20 years ago remember tape recorders were going to ruin the industry.... "

Try 35 years ago! I remember back in the 70's that the recording industry would strong-arm FM stations into not playing whole album sides to prevent people from taping their broadcast. Rumor had it that they pushed the whole talking over the intro and song endings too to foil any "bootleggers".(But I think that started back in the 50's). Back then FM, especially FM stereo was a real boon to music broadcasts. That along with ever improving recording technology more than made up for some of the loss in quality when taping. Not to mention while the audio quality of the music was pretty good most people had cheap tape players that masked most of the defects.

Even if you use top notch professional analog recording gear, there's STILL loss of data, especially if you want to make a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy... you get the idea. If properly encoded, a 10th generation MP3 copy will be truly identical to the original.
--
SBC DSL Tech Support.


Razor66
T0y0ta 4 Life Semper Fi

join:2004-02-29
San Francisco, CA
reply to login name
I suppose if I share a split banana with my wife, I suppose the RIAA will come and fine me for that

login name
Premium
join:2000-08-11

reply to LordMalak
Bull****.

The riaa cared just as much when tape players came out as they do now. The only difference is now we have a medium in which trading is extremely simple and easy: The internet.
--
"So, computers? I hear they basically break down to a bunch of ones and zeroes. I don't know how that means I can see naked womenon my screen, but God bless you people."


P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium
join:2001-08-29
Mineola, NY
clubs:

reply to Nightfall
said by Nightfall See Profile:
They aren't afraid of tape recorders. They are afraid of the direct inputs to the digital radio. XM Satellite Radio has a system you can hook to your PC. If you know where to look, you can purchase a output and go directly to your computer where you can record hours of digial quality music straight to your PC. I know some people who do this and use a music editing program to take the music they want and save it to mp3s.

Quite a nice little system I might add.

But the quality is no where near CD.....they cut down after 14k and its about 64k-86k tops....So i would not call this near digital quality
--
www.stopfcc.comI do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob.


Spike401
Fox Powered

join:2002-04-27
Labrador
reply to login name
Since when was mp3 high quality?


Spike401
Fox Powered

join:2002-04-27
Labrador

reply to LordMalak
said by LordMalak See Profile:
The RIAA never cared about analog copying due to generation loss. Copying digital content (CD-R, digital radio, MP3, etc.) bothers them because it's a perfect, bit-by-bit copy of the original.

Are you on crack? The RIAA wants you to believe MP3's are a perfect bit by bit copy. Do you realize mp3's are like 1/10 of the original recording? Or do you believe into the RIAA propaganda?
--
Join us in boycotting the Music And Film Industry Associations of America (MAFIAA)


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Site5.com
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast

reply to P Ness
said by P Ness See Profile:
said by Nightfall See Profile:
They aren't afraid of tape recorders. They are afraid of the direct inputs to the digital radio. XM Satellite Radio has a system you can hook to your PC. If you know where to look, you can purchase a output and go directly to your computer where you can record hours of digial quality music straight to your PC. I know some people who do this and use a music editing program to take the music they want and save it to mp3s.

Quite a nice little system I might add.

But the quality is no where near CD.....they cut down after 14k and its about 64k-86k tops....So i would not call this near digital quality

XM Satellite Radio broadcasts in 128k quality. That is the quality you get when you record straight to your PC using the PC XM setup. I don't know what other digital radio stations will be using, but I know XM.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal
Forums » Digital Radio Concerns RIAAThe RIAA exposed... »
« Keeping a 50's business model in the 20th century.  
page: 1 · 2


Tuesday, 01-Dec 18:33:55 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [67] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [55] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [46] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [39] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [34] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [24] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [22] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
Most people now reading
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Download speeds very slow. [AT&T West]
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· Ooma changing features [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Need a better layout.. [Home Repair & Improvement]