republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Alarming ZoneAlarm? » Compentant Security
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
604
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
*shrug* »
« what better place for an ad  
AuthorAll Replies

dumbTNtech

join:2003-04-29
Knoxville, TN

reply to Steve
Re: Compentant Security

Say what you will, I've been doing ISP support for four years now and I haven't seen the ICF keep anyone offline. I have seen Zone Alarm suddenly block ALL incoming and outgoing traffic for no apparent reason. Then it's a real pain to remove. The ICF in WindowsXP seems to do a very good job. The only situation where it's not helpful is when you have a trojan on your system letting someone or something in. Of course, that never happens to anyone here.......
--
"Don't try to explain computers to a layman-easier to explain sex to a virgin."-R.A. Heinlein

keyboard5684

join:2001-08-01
Youngsville, PA
·Teliax VOIP
·WestPAnet Inc.
·WestPAnet Inc. CA..

reply to SpitefulCrow
iptables, a Linux thing. Completely off base. We are not talking about complex firewall operations (which in my opinion the FreeBSD ipfw is far superior to a simple iptables function in linux), we are talking about Windows firewalls.

Zone alarm compared to the Windows firewall that is built in. In my eyes the Windows firewall is better because it shuts up. I do not think you should have to watch a firewall, it should just do its job. How many people go through there firewall logs and actually do something about it?

PIX firewall can track and customize matching/action on every field of the frame. Even a Cisco router can do what you stated without the firewall feature set. Checkpoint firewall can do it all to. I can go on and on about how many different firewall setups are better but since you learned how to write an iptable rule congrats.


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA

reply to Rhobite
said by Rhobite See Profile:
Even the older one lets you open ports individually.

Ooh wow, opening ports. That's so great.
iptables supports connection tracking and customized matching based on almost every field in the packet/frame.


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:
reply to Steve
Even the older one lets you open ports individually.


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA


1 edit
reply to keyboard5684
said by keyboard5684 See Profile:
Windows firewall allows you to modufy it to "open ports" or do what you wish.
The one in XP/SP2: yes. The older firewall really sucked (even though it did what it claimed).
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site

keyboard5684

join:2001-08-01
Youngsville, PA
reply to SpitefulCrow
Windows firewall allows you to modufy it to "open ports" or do what you wish.


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA
reply to SpitefulCrow
<xprave>Yay for firewalls that have more than two users</xprave>


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA

reply to Steve
said by Steve See Profile:
said by SpitefulCrow See Profile:
Yay for system boot procedures that load firewall code and rulesets before any kind of network interface is brought online.
/linuxrave
<xprave>Yah for XP Service Pack 2, which does the same thing</xprave>

Yay for firewalls that give the user more control than "On" and "Off". /linuxrave


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

reply to SpitefulCrow
said by SpitefulCrow See Profile:
Yay for system boot procedures that load firewall code and rulesets before any kind of network interface is brought online.
/linuxrave
<xprave>Yah for XP Service Pack 2, which does the same thing</xprave>


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA
reply to dave
Yay for system boot procedures that load firewall code and rulesets before any kind of network interface is brought online.
/linuxrave


pcscdma
Chocobo Chocobo Random Battle
Premium
join:2004-01-14
Winterset, IA
clubs:
reply to Steve
at least this hasn't turned into a fight between Microsoft and Linu$ Torvald$' wares.
--
Be patriotic or I'm reporting you to Ashcroft.


Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
·Qwest.net


1 edit
reply to navalpatel
said by navalpatel See Profile:
At least ZoneAlarm is somewhat competant at what it is designed to do... compared to say anything that Microsoft may make (i.e. Windows firewall).

Don't compare the lame Windows Firewall as it is now with
what in included on the SP-2 Beta it works as well as any software firewall I have used.
--
»www.gobpl.com

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
·Verizon Online DSL
·Verizon FIOS

reply to Rhobite
said by Rhobite See Profile:
Please give a specific example of what the Windows firewall fails to do. The only thing I can think of is that during startup there's a brief period of exposure before the firewall kicks in. I agree that this is a small problem but it's fixed in SP2.

...and it's not clear that ZA does not have the same exposure (see Security forum posts passim).


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:

reply to navalpatel
Please give a specific example of what the Windows firewall fails to do. The only thing I can think of is that during startup there's a brief period of exposure before the firewall kicks in. I agree that this is a small problem but it's fixed in SP2.
--
Jimmysquid.com - I take pictures.


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

reply to dave
said by dave See Profile:
There's one in every crowd, huh?
at least he didn't spell "Microsoft" with a $


Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

reply to navalpatel
said by navalpatel See Profile:
At least ZoneAlarm is somewhat competant at what it is designed to do... compared to say anything that Microsoft may make (i.e. Windows firewall).

No, XP's firewall did exactly what it was designed to do; block unsolicited incoming connections. It just didn't do what you wanted it to do; block outgoing connections.
--
Japan-- Now with 30% more climbable telephone poles!!

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
·Verizon Online DSL
·Verizon FIOS

reply to navalpatel
said by navalpatel See Profile:
At least ZoneAlarm is somewhat competant at what it is designed to do... compared to say anything that Microsoft may make (i.e. Windows firewall).

There's one in every crowd, huh?

... and it's strange how they usually can't spell.

navalpatel

join:2003-07-28
Lubbock, TX
At least ZoneAlarm is somewhat competant at what it is designed to do... compared to say anything that Microsoft may make (i.e. Windows firewall).
Forums » Alarming ZoneAlarm?*shrug* »
« what better place for an ad  


Sunday, 29-Nov 14:35:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [76] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Shareport problem on DIR-655 [D-Link]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [ PVP] Druid pvp where to start? [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]