Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Alarming ZoneAlarm? » Compentant Security
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
*shrug* »
« what better place for an ad  
AuthorAll Replies


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA


1 edit
reply to keyboard5684
Re: Compentant Security

said by keyboard5684 See Profile:
Windows firewall allows you to modufy it to "open ports" or do what you wish.
The one in XP/SP2: yes. The older firewall really sucked (even though it did what it claimed).
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site


Rhobite
Premium
join:2002-02-24
Cambridge, MA
clubs:
Even the older one lets you open ports individually.


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA

said by Rhobite See Profile:
Even the older one lets you open ports individually.

Ooh wow, opening ports. That's so great.
iptables supports connection tracking and customized matching based on almost every field in the packet/frame.

keyboard5684

join:2001-08-01
Youngsville, PA
·Teliax VOIP
·WestPAnet Inc.
·WestPAnet Inc. CA..

iptables, a Linux thing. Completely off base. We are not talking about complex firewall operations (which in my opinion the FreeBSD ipfw is far superior to a simple iptables function in linux), we are talking about Windows firewalls.

Zone alarm compared to the Windows firewall that is built in. In my eyes the Windows firewall is better because it shuts up. I do not think you should have to watch a firewall, it should just do its job. How many people go through there firewall logs and actually do something about it?

PIX firewall can track and customize matching/action on every field of the frame. Even a Cisco router can do what you stated without the firewall feature set. Checkpoint firewall can do it all to. I can go on and on about how many different firewall setups are better but since you learned how to write an iptable rule congrats.

dumbTNtech

join:2003-04-29
Knoxville, TN

reply to Steve
Say what you will, I've been doing ISP support for four years now and I haven't seen the ICF keep anyone offline. I have seen Zone Alarm suddenly block ALL incoming and outgoing traffic for no apparent reason. Then it's a real pain to remove. The ICF in WindowsXP seems to do a very good job. The only situation where it's not helpful is when you have a trojan on your system letting someone or something in. Of course, that never happens to anyone here.......
--
"Don't try to explain computers to a layman-easier to explain sex to a virgin."-R.A. Heinlein
Forums » Alarming ZoneAlarm?*shrug* »
« what better place for an ad  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 03:39:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [54] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [12] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]