republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Zombies Attack Akamai » "not usually capable of such precision" ?
Uniqs:
73
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
'bot net', really? »
« SBC bounces your mail with reverse DNS check!  

Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

"not usually capable of such precision" ?

My understanding is that these bot networks are highly precise: they're controlled by IRC, and they can be remotely controlled to attack anything on cue.

???
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site
onin
Premium
join:2004-06-02
North York, ON

Re: "not usually capable of such precision" ?

yes it is.
Flizesh
Premium
join:2003-08-16
Staten Island, NY
clubs:

Re: "not usually capable of such precision" ?

CNET knows jack
pnosker
Premium
join:2003-03-26
Stockton, NJ
clubs:

Not necessarily. I have friends (ones who claim to have done this, which I doubt) who tell me that they target a set of ips, given to the bots with something like !ddos IPRANGE (ie. 111.111.111.***). They don't target one site, but I guess you could do a dnslookup on each site and get their exact ips. I'm sure 20,000 bots or so could do this much damage, and I know people with more than that.

Most people with botnets don't waste their time with corporate websites though, they target others who piss them off, like for instance if an IRC network splits, they attack the other network's shells.
ced06

join:2004-03-12
Towanda, PA

Re: "not usually capable of such precision" ?

I've seen people DDoS websites before...usually they just do !ddos riaa.org (the guy ddosed the riaa website), not bothering to mess with an IP range. :|

devrandom
I got a pot, full of random stuff here
Premium
join:2003-06-28
They probably mean the preciseness of the actual strike. I hear Akamai's network is pretty hard to take down. Must have been some attack..
Forums » Zombies Attack Akamai'bot net', really? »
« SBC bounces your mail with reverse DNS check!  


Thursday, 10-Dec 22:18:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [136] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [87] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [55] Average American Consumes 34 Gigabytes Daily
· [52] AT&T: iPhone Data Pricing Comments 'Taken Out Of Context'
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
Most people now reading
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]