MazakGuy7
join:2004-03-05
Hillsdale, MI
clubs:
| reply to sabersaw
Re: I'm always amazed ...
said by sabersaw  :
said by BigCreek :
well in the meantime, anyone who interferes with a licensed radio station should be fined.
Then the fcc should just stop issuing ham licenses. Then we just have to wait awhile, then there will be NO one to complain about interference. |
|
sabersaw
Premium
join:2001-08-21
Dayton, OH
| yeah, that sounds like a great idea.
but what about the other services in the HF bands and 30-80 MHZ.. don't forget Aircraft, Maritime, WWV atomic clock sync signals, Military Affiliate Radio System, WeFAX, VHF lowband (used by business and county/state/city utilities/police).
Also, toss out my first amendment right while your at it.. I don't care to listen to broadcasts originating from other countries.
I don't think so.
not for this snake oil, my friend. |
|
Balzer
Cat Man Dew
join:2000-12-18
Tulsa
 ·Cox HSI
| reply to MazakGuy7
said by MazakGuy7 :
said by sabersaw :
said by BigCreek :
well in the meantime, anyone who interferes with a licensed radio station should be fined.
Then the fcc should just stop issuing ham licenses. Then we just have to wait awhile, then there will be NO one to complain about interference.
Who said anything about ham radio?
--
Televangelists are The Pro Wrestlers of religion! |
|
rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
USA
| reply to MazakGuy7
said by MazakGuy7 :
Then the fcc should just stop issuing ham licenses. Then we just have to wait awhile, then there will be NO one to complain about interference.
You'll have to go to the ITU and convince some 200 other countries to stop issuing licenses as well ( »www.iaru.org/statsum00.html ). After that, you'll need to tackle the other 90% of HF spectrum users which are the government, military, ships, and planes, among others.
It might be easier to deploy a technology that doesn't interfere. |
|
